Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rankin, 965 So. 2d 946.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Murl Ray Rodgers La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    App. 2 Cir. 9/19/07), writ denied, 07-2067 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nicquarious Shukkor Hewitt La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    App. 2 Cir. 9/19/07), writ denied, 07-2067 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Cody Breaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
    App. 2 Cir. 09/19/17), writ denied, 07-2067 (La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Dkerian Thompson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    App. 2d Cir. 9/ 19107), writ denied, 2007- 2067 ( La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lance S. Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    State v. Rankin, 42,412 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07)
  • State v. Wilson 189 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Rankin, 42,412 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07), .
  • State v. Hart 183 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    art. 801 D(1); State v. Rankin, 42,412 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07), , writ denied, 07-2067 (La.3/7/08), .
  • State v. Robinson 151 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Rankin, 42,412 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07), , writ denied, 2007-2067 (La.3/7/08), .
  • State ex rel. K.M. 146 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    2 Cir. 9/19/07), , 4 |7this court *871 recognized that the 2004 amendment to La.
  • State v. Jones 132 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Considering the 2004 change to art. 801, this court noted in State v. Rankin, 42,412 (La.App.2nd Cir.09/19/07), , “Before these prior [inconsistent] statements can be accepted as nonhearsay, and therefore probative, additional evidence must also corroborate the facts sought to be proved by these prior inconsistent statements.” (Emphasis added).
  • State v. Updite 87 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    See State v. Rankin, 42,412 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07), , writ denied, 2007-2067 (La.3/7/08), ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See State v. Rankin, 42,412 (La.App.2d Cir 9/19/07) which recognized that the 2004 amendment to C.E.
  • State Ex Rel. Dw 47 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 9/19/07), , writ denied, 07-2067 (La.3/7/08), , and State v. Harper, 07-0299 at 13-14, 970 So.2d at 601, citing, George W. Pugh et al., Handbook on Louisiana Evidence Law 471-472, authors' note no. 9 to Article 607 (2006).
  • State ex rel. D.W. 47 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 9/19/07), , writ denied, 07-2067 (La.3/7/08), , and State v. Harper, 07-0299 at 13-14, 970 So.2d at 601, citing, George W. Pugh et al., Handbook on Louisiana Evidence Law 471-472, authors’ note no. 9 to Article 607 (2006).