DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 956 So. 2d 192.

18 citing documents.

  • Volentine v. Raeford Farms of Louisiana, LLC 201 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Green, supra; Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • Data-Core Systems, Inc. v. PVR America Inc. 200 So. 3d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Stephenson v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P., 45,296 (La.App.2d Cir.6/2/10), ; Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 2007-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • Che v. First Assembly of God 185 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42, -019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/07), ; Coleman v. Burgundy Oaks, L.L.C., 46,314 (La.App.2d Cir.6/8/11), .
  • Norwood v. Mobley Valve Services, Inc. 144 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), .
  • Johnson v. Motiva Enterprises LLC 128 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Skannal v. Jones Odom Davis & Politz, L.L.P. 124 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Stephenson v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P., 45,296 (La.App.2d Cir.6/2/10), ; Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • Gaddy v. Universal Cable Systems, Inc. 131 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    In Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), -199 , writ denied, 2007-1172 (La.9/21/07), , this court noted that under Louisiana law, corporate separateness is recognized and respected.
  • Smith v. Coffman 87 So. 3d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Agency, Inc. v. International Risk Consultants, Inc., 27,353 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/95), , writ denied, 96-0102 (La.3/8/96), ; Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,-019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/07), ; Stephenson v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P., 45,296 (La.App.2d Cir.6/2/10), .
  • Coleman v. Burgundy Oaks, L.L.C. 71 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.05/02/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.09/21/07), .
  • Hoover Tree Farm, L.L.C. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 63 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Stephenson v. Petrohawk, supra; Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • Bottom Line Equipment, L.L.C. v. BZ Equipment, L.L.C. 60 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2 Cir. 5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • Prasad v. Bullard 51 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • Stephenson v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P. 37 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 2007-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Foundation, Inc. v. Kirksey 40 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Smith v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 35 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 2007-1172 (La.9/21/07), .
  • Orr Motors of Louisiana, Inc. v. Jamar 4 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.05/02/07), , writ denied, 2007-1172 (La.09/21/07), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    2 Cir. 5/2/07), ; Andry v. Murphy Oil, U.S.S., Inc., 2005-0126, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • Town of Haynesville v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 987 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    In Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp., 42,019 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), , writ denied, 07-1172 (La.9/21/97), , ( "Haynesville *887 # 2" ), this court ruled that the various utilities (including ELI) wholly owned by the Entergy Corporation, a public utility holding company, were not a single business entity.