Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Jones, 93 So. 2d 917.
-
Allen v. Allen
648 So. 2d 359
La. 1994
(1957); Reich v. Grieff, 214 La.
- Fisher v. American Employers Insurance Co. 187 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
-
Harless v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
164 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
34 , ; , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
-
Peart v. Slocum
142 So. 2d 421
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
430 , , , , Pierre v. Galloway, La.App., , Guidry v. Crowther, La.App., , Lebo v. Metropolitan Casualty Co. of New York, La.App., , Scruggins v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, La.App., .
-
Scruggins v. Connecticut Fire Insurance
137 So. 2d 368
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
430 , ; , ; Pierre v. Galloway, La.
-
Primus v. Primus
129 So. 2d 925
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
456 , ; Jones v. Jones, 1957, , ; Kendrick v. Kendrick, 1958, 236 La.
-
Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co.
121 So. 2d 344
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Fouquier v. Fouquier, 231 La.
-
Bailey v. Brown
118 So. 2d 282
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
As we state in Pierre v. Galloway, La.App., , at page 917, “the trial court’s factual determinations should not be disturbed on review unless manifestly erroneous, , 93 So.
-
Vigneaux v. Segura
107 So. 2d 864
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
the court said: “ * * * The conclusion of fact reached by the trial court and its judgment thereon will not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous.
-
Kendrick v. Kendrick
106 So. 2d 707
La. 1958
Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
-
Johnson v. Wilson
97 So. 2d 674
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Fouquier v. Fouquier, 231 La.
-
McClendon v. Wall
96 So. 2d 246
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Fouquier v. Fouquier, 231 La.
-
Pierre v. Galloway
96 So. 2d 916
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
And the trial court's factual determinations should not be disturbed on review unless manifestly erroneous, , , especially when based upon an evaluation of the credibility of opposing witnesses, Fouquier v. Fouquier, 231 La.
-
Guidry v. Crowther
96 So. 2d 71
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
The trial court's findings of fact will not be disturbed by a reviewing court unless manifestly erroneous, , , especially when based upon an evaluation of the credibility of opposing witnesses, Fouquier v. Fouquier, 231 La.