Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Palmer, 80 So. 2d 374.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. Chase 329 So. 2d 434 La. 1976
    (1955): "In determining their admissibility, proper inquiry should be made to ascertain whether such evidence would clarify some material issue and would afford the court and the jury a clearer comprehension of existing physical facts and throw greater light and more accurate appreciation of the we
  • State v. Chambers 270 So. 2d 514 La. 1972
    747 ; State v. Palmer (1955), , .” Bills Nos. 12, 13, 14, and 15 were reserved in connection with various rulings of the court admitting five exhibits tendered by the state.
  • State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
  • State v. Hopper 203 So. 2d 222 La. 1967
  • State v. Lewis 199 So. 2d 907 La. 1967
  • State v. Gregoire 192 So. 2d 114 La. 1966
    15:451; , ; State v. Cloud, 246 La.
  • State v. Richard 158 So. 2d 828 La. 1963
    15:447; , ; State v. Jugger, 217 La.
  • State v. Scott 141 So. 2d 389 La. 1962
    163 , ; , .” State v. Peart, 232 La.
  • State v. Fulghum 138 So. 2d 569 La. 1962
  • State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
    * * *” , ; State v. Scott, 237 La.
  • State v. Ferguson 124 So. 2d 558 La. 1960
    State v. Palmer, 1955, , , and authorities there cited; State v. Smith, 216 La.
  • State v. Kelly 112 So. 2d 674 La. 1959
  • State v. Miller 111 So. 2d 108 La. 1959
    269 , ; , ; State v. Lea, 228 La.
  • State v. Scott 110 So. 2d 530 La. 1959
  • State v. Smith 99 So. 2d 8 La. 1958
    163 , ; , ; State v. Walker, 229 La.
  • State v. Bailey 96 So. 2d 34 La. 1957
  • State v. Edwards 94 So. 2d 674 La. 1957
    163 , ; , ; State v. Hilliard, 227 La.
  • State v. Kennedy 95 So. 2d 301 La. 1957
  • State v. Goins 94 So. 2d 244 La. 1957
  • State v. Blankenship 93 So. 2d 533 La. 1957
  • State v. Peart 93 So. 2d 920 La. 1957
  • State v. Jones 88 So. 2d 655 La. 1956
  • State v. Reinhardt 86 So. 2d 530 La. 1956
    362, 367 , we held: “ * * * It is true that the evidence tended to prove the commission of other crimes like the one charged; but evidence that is relevant to some issue in a criminal prosecution is not rendered inadmissible by being prejudicial to the defendant.” Also see, , .
  • State v. Walker 85 So. 2d 497 La. 1956
    “The Court feels that the admissibility of the confessions was proved beyond any question but especially so in the absence of any proof to the contrary by the defendant, at any time during the trial.” , , wherein we disposed of an identical bill and stated the well settled law in this state that before a confession can be introduced in evidence it must be affirmatively shown that it was free and voluntary and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, *233 indu
  • Sparks v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance 83 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    382: “In this modern era it has been universally recognized that courts must take judicial cognizance that all civilized communities must perforce rely on photographic pictures in presenting inanimate, natural and physical objects and resemblances of persons.