Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Deason v. McWilliams, 81 So. 2d 8.

14 citing documents.

Deville v. LaGrange 388 So. 2d 696 La. 1980
(1955), in which parents attempted to conceal the birth of their child and surrendered the child to a couple located by an attorney.
Wren v. Wren 301 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Deason v. McWilliams, 1955, , , as follows: ‘As this is a habeas corpus proceeding, the custody of the child is the sole issue to be decided by this court.
Hollie v. Simon 242 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
State Ex Rel. Stokes v. Stokes 222 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
State ex rel. Tusa v. Tusa 221 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
] and Peniston cases) we reiterated such principles practically verbatim with emphasis and approval.
In Re State Ex Rel. Thoman 218 So. 2d 571 La. 1969
Shilling v. Doyle 218 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Brown v. Ellison 162 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
State Ex Rel. Rothrock v. Webber 161 So. 2d 759 La. 1964
State ex rel. Rothrock v. Webber 155 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
* * * “After carefully reviewing the authorities submitted by able counsel for both relators and respondents, this court feels that the issues here presented are very much like the situation in State ex rel Deason v. McWilliams [ ], .
Mouton v. Romain 153 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
in which our Supreme Court, by a 4 to 3 decision, decided the natural parents had abandoned the child and forfeited their rights to its custody.
State ex rel. Hebert v. Knight 135 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
State Ex Rel. Paul v. Peniston 105 So. 2d 228 La. 1958
957 , , as follows: “As this is a habeas corpus proceeding, the custody of the child is the sole, issue to be decided • by this court.
In Re Harville 96 So. 2d 20 La. 1957