Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co., 117 So. 2d 261.

39 citing documents.

Trans Louisiana Gas Co. v. Heard 629 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
The case of State vs. Central Realty Investment Company, , (1960), defines market value for purposes of compensation to be awarded in expropriation cases as the price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Harris 423 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
State, Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Company,- , (I960).” 284 So.2d at 766 .
State, Dept. of Highways v. Bitterwolf 415 So. 2d 196 La. 1982
Co., , (1960); Thomas & Warner v. City of New Orleans, 230 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Moseley 390 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Co., , (1960); Thomas & Warner v. City of New Orleans, 230 La.
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Westport Development Co., Inc. 332 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
(1960); Thomas & Warner v. City of New Orleans, 230 La.
State, Department of Highways v. Tyler 326 So. 2d 349 La. 1976
State, Dept. of Highways v. Port Properties, Inc. 316 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
State, , (1960); Thomas & Warner v. City of New Orleans, 230 La.
State v. Wells 308 So. 2d 774 La. 1975
State, Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973); State, , (1960).
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Jacobsen 306 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Wood Preserving Service, Inc. 302 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Waterbury, La.App.
State, Through Department of Highways v. Hoyt 284 So. 2d 763 La. 1973
State, Dept. of Highways v. Trippeer Realty Corp. 276 So. 2d 315 La. 1973
(1960); Thomas & Warner v. City of New Orleans, 230 La.
State, Department of Highways v. Hoyt 272 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Norris 268 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
1035 , (1969); and State, , (1960).
United Gas Pipe Line v. Schwegmann 267 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Company, Inc., , ; Harrison v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 191 La.
Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Harrison 260 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State Dept. of Hwys, v. Central Realty Investment Co., , ; State Dept. of Hwys.
State, Department of Highways v. Thurman 231 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
942 , (1941) , (1960): "If, as a result of constructing new work, the remaining land or part of it is left fronting on a road or street, and the land fronting the road or street is more desirable and more valuable because of the frontage, the advantage thus gained is a special or peculiar benefit, and damage to
Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Lasseigne 220 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
On the statement that the rule that benefits cannot be set-off from the value of the land taken was established by judicial *468 decisions, these cases are cited: ; Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Edwards, La.App., , citing Treatise; , ; City of New Orleans v. Giraud, 238 La.
State, Dept. of Hys. v. William T. Burton Indus., Inc. 219 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Waterbury, La.App.
State, Department of Highways v. Mouledous 200 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
State, Department of Highways, v. Dodge, , (1960).
State v. DeLoach 188 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
48:453; State Through Dept. of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co., Inc., , .
Gulf States Utilities Company v. Norman 183 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Co., , , and cases therein cited; Comment, 18 La.L.
State, Department of Highways v. Landry 171 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
and cases cited therein.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Leger 170 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
191 , ; , ; State Through Department of Highways v. Gani, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1962).
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Acme Brick Co. 162 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Harrison v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 191 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Caillier 157 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Carret, La.App., .
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. New Orleans Term. Co. 156 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Company, Inc., , ; Harrison v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 191 La.
State v. Rapier 152 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Orleans Parish School Board v. Dorsett 154 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
State of Louisiana, through Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Company, Inc., , .
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Hayward 150 So. 2d 6 La. 1963
Parish of Iberia v. Cook, 238 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. O'Neal 149 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, 229 La.
State v. Gani 138 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, 229 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Madden 139 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
887 , (1959); State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Company, Inc., , (1960); State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways v. Havard, 239 La.
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Nezat 136 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
in expropriation cases is the market value of the propertythat is, a price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser * * * and that sales of similar and comparable property within the vicinity offer the best guide in determining the market value to which the owner is entitled * * *', , .
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Fuselier 133 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
expropriation cases is the market value of the propertythat is, a price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser * * * and that sales of similar and comparable property within the vicinity offer the best guide in determining the market value to which the owner is entitled * *", , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Carret 130 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
expropriation cases is the market value of the property —that is, a price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser * * * and that sales of similar and comparable property within the vicinity offer the best guide in determining the market value to which the owner is entitled * * * ”, , .
Town of Golden Meadow v. Duet 121 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
942 , ; State Through Dept, , ; and authorities therein cited.
Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Edwards 119 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hub Realty Co. 118 So. 2d 364 La. 1960
As stated in State of Louisiana Through Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co., Inc., , 117 So.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by