Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Union Oil Company of California v. Touchet, 86 So. 2d 50.

27 citing documents.

Gilmer v. Principle Energy 256 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
v. Touchet , , (1956) ; Le Blanc v. Haynesville Mercantile Co. , 230 La.
Frey v. Amoco Production Co. 603 So. 2d 166 La. 1992
660, 671 , (1958) (royalty owner's right to share in the minerals accrues if and when they are produced); , (1956) ("It is well settled that the right of the owner of a royalty interest is restricted to a share in production if and when it is obtained.").
Producers Oil & Gas Co. v. Nix 488 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Sandefer & Andress, Inc. v. Pruitt 471 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
STATE ETC. v. National Advertising Co. 356 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
United Gas Pipeline Company v. Bellard 286 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Baker v. Chevron Oil Company 258 So. 2d 531 La. 1972
The Court of Appeal correctly held that “Since the well was on property other than on the property in which plaintiffs claim a mineral interest, unitization must have been completed prior to March 29, 1966.” (Emphasis added) , (1956), which was approved in Viator v. Haynesville Mercantile Company, 230 La.
Baker v. Chevron Oil Co. 245 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Nelson v. Young 234 So. 2d 54 La. 1970
216 , ; , ; Elkins v. Roseberry, 233 La.
Nelson v. Young 223 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
In Pan American v. O’Bier (supra), the Court quoted the following from Union *222 , : “ ‘ * * * it is a firmly entrenched principle of Louisiana mineral law that no act on the part of a landowner will have the effect of extending the life of a mineral interest unless it is shown that there was a clear intention on the part of the landowner to achieve that very result.’ ” An examination
Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. O'BIER 201 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
: "* * * it is a firmly entrenched principle of Louisiana mineral law that no act on the part of a landowner will have the effect of extending the life of a mineral interest unless it is shown that there was a clear intention on the part of the landowner to achieve that very result."
LeBleu v. LeBleu 206 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
216 , (1953); , (1956); Elkins v. Roseberry, 233 La.
Williams v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company 193 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
See, also: , (1956); Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Thompson, supra.
Lee v. Goodwin 174 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
383 , (1952); Union Oil Company of California *654 v. Touchet, , (1956).
Armour v. Smith 170 So. 2d 347 La. 1964
den.); , ; Namie v. Namie, La.App., (cert.
McDonald v. Grande Corporation 148 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Landry v. Flaitz 148 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Levy v. Bonfouca Hunting Club 136 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Namie v. Namie 134 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Odom v. Union Producing Company 129 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Scallan v. Simmesport State Bank 129 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
1085 , ; , ; Hayward v. Carolina Insurance Co., La.App., and 19 Am.Jur.
Phillips Petroleum Company v. Richard 127 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
821 , ; , and Boddie v. Drewett, supra.
Elkins v. Roseberry 96 So. 2d 41 La. 1957
Delatte v. Woods 94 So. 2d 281 La. 1957
Le Blanc v. Haynesville Mercantile Company, Inc. 88 So. 2d 377 La. 1956
Viator v. Haynesville Mercantile Company 88 So. 2d 1 La. 1956
The identical factual issue here presented was recently considered by us in the case of Union Oil Co. of California v. Touchet, La., .
Boddie v. Drewett 87 So. 2d 516 La. 1956