Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 80 So. 2d 105.

28 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Brian K. Malveaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
the court reversed the defendant‟s conviction due to improper comments made in the prosecutor‟s closing argument when he stated, “„[d]on‟t come in here with any qualified verdict.
State v. Chandler 939 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Lombard 471 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
in which the Supreme Court of Louisiana, , (1955), said that even if objected-to language is impermissible, its use does not constitute reversible error unless the court is thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks, and *791 that they contributed to the verdict.
State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Sayles 395 So. 2d 695 La. 1981
State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
State v. Searle 339 So. 2d 1194 La. 1976
State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
State v. Chaffin 324 So. 2d 369 La. 1975
State v. McCauley 272 So. 2d 335 La. 1973
State v. Williams 269 So. 2d 232 La. 1972
State ex rel. Barksdale v. Henderson 242 So. 2d 886 La. 1971
910 (1941); , (1955); State v. Weston, 232 La.
State v. Poland 232 So. 2d 499 La. 1970
910 ; , ; and State v. Weston, 232 La.
State v. Hopper 203 So. 2d 222 La. 1967
State v. Dennis 194 So. 2d 720 La. 1967
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
896 , ; , , and authorities cited.
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
896 , ; , , and authorities cited.
State v. Scott 141 So. 2d 389 La. 1962
State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
989 , , , , are complete authority for the conclusion that in the instant case the State should not be forced to elect.
State v. Newton 128 So. 2d 651 La. 1961
30 , ; , and State v. Weston, Jr., 232 La.
State v. Thomas 123 So. 2d 872 La. 1960
107 we said: “ * * * Moreover the statute itself provides that aggravated rape may be committed under ‘any one or more of the following circumstances’.
State v. Stahl 107 So. 2d 670 La. 1958
and numerous authorities cited there.
State v. Birdsell 104 So. 2d 148 La. 1958
State v. Brazile 99 So. 2d 62 La. 1958
it was said: “ * * * Under the jurisprudence of this court, before a verdict approved by the judge is set aside on the ground of improper argument of such a nature as this, this court must be thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks and that they contributed to the verdict
State v. Faciane 99 So. 2d 333 La. 1957
366 ; , ; State v. Rowan, 233 La.
State v. Rowan 96 So. 2d 569 La. 1957
989 , , , , are complete authority for the conclusion that in the instant case the State should not be forced to elect.
State v. Weston 95 So. 2d 305 La. 1957
910 , , wherein it was held that it was reversible error for the trial judge to refuse to allow defense counsel to ask prospective jurymen on their voir dire examination whether they had any conscientious scruples against imposing a qualified verdict in a capital case in the event the evidence convinced them
State v. Brossette 86 So. 2d 87 La. 1956