DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., 86 So. 2d 522.

86 citing documents.

  • Guillory v. Maryland Casualty Company 227 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    1012 , ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Johnson v. Cabot Carbon Co., 227 La.
  • Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc. 222 So. 2d 849 La. 1969
    See also Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , 86 So.
  • Devillier v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 219 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , .
  • LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. 193 So. 2d 779 La. 1967
    653 , ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , and Bernard v. Louisiana Wild Life & Fisheries Commission (La.App.), , (cert.
  • Mella v. Continental Emsco 189 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    1012 , ; and (3) the trial court improperly sustained *718 the plea of two years' peremption based on the authority of Morgan v. Rust Engineering Company, La.App., ; Cook v. International Paper Co., La.App., ; and Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , .
  • LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. 185 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    23:1317; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., et al., , ; Meyers v. Southwest Region Conference Association of Seventh Day Adventists, et al., 230 La.
  • Meredith v. Contractors Equipment Co. 178 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    There is a period of ‘peremption of two years from the date of the accident within which all suits must be instituted.’ Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , .
  • Overruled Russell v. Employers Mutual Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 169 So. 2d 82 La. 1964
    941 , , , where pleas of one-year prescription were overruled.
  • Forrestier v. A-1 Moving & Storage Co. 164 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Bigham v. Swift & Co., 229 La.
  • Smith v. Sohio Petroleum Company 163 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    See Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , .
  • Gary v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 158 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    There is a period of “peremption of two years from the date of the accident within which all suits must be instituted.” Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , .
  • Guidry v. Mud Supply Co. 155 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Bigham v. Swift & Co., 229 La.
  • Whatley v. Insurance Co. of North America 154 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    653 , ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Watson v. United States Tobacco Co. (2nd Circuit, 1956, writs denied), La.App., ; and Bynum v. Maryland Casualty Company (1st Circuit, 1958, writs denied, La.App., ).
  • Goodley v. Brunet 150 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Bassemier v. W. S. Young Const. Co., La.App.
  • McKee v. International Paper Co. 146 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    653 , (1952) that “the injury did not develop into total disability until March 11, 1947, at which time the plaintiff could no longer pursue his trade as a glass cutter.” In Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc. et al., , (1956), the following comment appears: “R.S.
  • Jackson v. T. L. James & Co. 141 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    653 , ; , ; Johnson v. Cabot Carbon Company, 227 La.
  • Madison v. American Sugar Refining Co. 134 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    653 , , Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , , and Watson v. United States Tobacco Co., La.App., (writs denied), we conclude that the phrase 'development of injury’ must be interpreted as meaning the time from which an employee can no longer pursue his trade or occupation.” While we agree with the courts definition, as it relates to t
  • Fruge v. Hub City Iron Works, Inc. 131 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 220 La.
  • Griffin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 131 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    App., 1 Cir., 1955, ; Walters v. General Accident & Fire Assurance Corp., Ltd., La.App., 1 Cir., 1960, ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., La.App., 2 Cir., 1954, , reversed on other grounds 1956, at , .
  • Lindsey v. Continental Casualty Co. 130 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 220 La.
  • Fontenot v. Great American Indemnity Company 127 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    941 , ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , and Brewster v. City of Shreveport, La.App., .
  • Istre v. Molbert Brothers Poultry and Egg Co. 125 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    See, , ; Bigham v. Swift & Co., 229 La.
  • Smith v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 116 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    Plaintiff has cited, in support of his contention that the period for which compensation is payable is not to be credited with the period for which wages are earned, the cases: Cradeur v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Murray v. Royal Indemnity Co., La.App., .
  • McKnight v. Clemons 114 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    549 (syllabus 6); cf., Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , (syllabi 2, 3).
  • Finley v. Hardware Mutual Insurance Company 110 So. 2d 583 La. 1959
    653 , and Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , .
  • Brewster v. City of Shreveport 108 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    653 , ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , , and Watson v. United States Tobacco Co., La.
  • McKinney v. Avondale Marine Ways, Inc. 107 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Bigham v. Swift & Co., 229 La.
  • Ceasar v. Calcasieu Paper Company 102 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    In sometimes almost identical circumstances, in Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , , Bigham v. Swift & Co., 229 La.
  • Croswell v. Wells 102 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    653 , ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; and Watson v. United States Tobacco Co., La.App., (writs denied by the Supreme Court).
  • Bynum v. Maryland Casualty Company 102 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    In Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , , Johnson v. Cabot Carbon Co., 227 La.
  • White v. Calcasieu Paper Company 96 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , ; Bigham v. Swift & Co., 229 La.
  • McMorris v. Home Indemnity Co. 94 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    “For our most recent expression see Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , .” .
  • Murray v. Royal Indemnity Co. 94 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
    In Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , , appears the following: “R.S.
  • France v. City of New Orleans 92 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    In Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., , , an accident befell the workman in June 1952, but he managed to continue on with his job until October 1953; an operation was required which was performed in December 1953, but without success, and the workman was never able to return to his former duties.
  • Banks v. Kent Piling Co. 87 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    23:1317; Wallace v. Remington Rand, La., , we have decided to remand the case to the District Court for the purpose of alternatively making parties to this suit the members of the partnership composing the K & H Stock Farm, rather than to dismiss plaintiff’s suit without prejudice to his plea of equitable estoppel.
  • Watson v. United States Tobacco Co. 87 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    941 , ; Wallace v. Remington-Rand, Inc., 1956, , ; Bigham v. Swift & Co., 1956, 229 La.