DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tugwell v. Members of the Board of Highways, 83 So. 2d 893.

28 citing documents.

  • Acadiana Renal Physicians, Amc v. Precious Hodges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
  • Gerald Bordelon v. Fulcrum Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Bordelon v. Fulcrum Insurance Co. 903 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • Prator v. Caddo Parish 888 So. 2d 812 La. 2004
    417 , (1964); , (1955)(on rehearing).
  • Prator v. Caddo Parish 865 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Calif. Union Ins. 859 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Edgar Benjamin Fontaine Testamentary Trust v. Jackson Brewery Marketplace 847 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Additionally, in American Waste & Pollution Control, the Louisiana State Supreme Court, , (1955), stated that “a declaratory action cannot generally be maintained unless it involves some specific adversary question or controversy ...
  • Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. 712 So. 2d 74 La. 1998
    (1955)(on rehearing)("[A] declaratory judgment action generally cannot be maintained unless it involves some specific adversary question or controversy asserted by interested parties and based on an existing state of facts, and a declaration of rights must be refused if the issue presented to the c
  • Perschall v. State 697 So. 2d 240 La. 1997
    (1955) (on rehearing), in which Justice Hawthorne aptly summarized the rationale behind this court's hesitancy to rule in the absence of a justiciable controversy: [t]he question presented for judicial decision must be real and not theoretical, as courts do not give advisory opinions upon abstract quest
  • American Waste v. St. Martin Parish 627 So. 2d 158 La. 1993
    of Hwys., , (1955), on rehr'g; 33 La.L.Rev.
  • Hainkel v. Henry 313 So. 2d 577 La. 1975
  • Holmes v. Holmes 270 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1955), that: “In order for courts to entertain an action for declaratory relief, however, it is well settled in other jurisdictions that there must be a justiciable controversy, and the question presented for judicial decision must be real and not theoretical, as courts do not give advisory opinions up
  • Fields v. Transtates Petroleum, Inc. 246 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1955); Stoddard v. City of New Orleans, 246 La.
  • Villa Del Rey Citizens Ass'n v. City of Baton Rouge 233 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    951 , ]; Tugwell v. Members of Board of Highways, 1955, , .” (Emphasis ours) We have reviewed the Rogers case and the authorities cited therein with particular reference to the import of such language as emphasized above.
  • Petition of Sewerage and Water Bd. of New Orleans 177 So. 2d 276 La. 1965
    (1955); State v. Board of Supervisors, 228 La.
  • Stoddard v. City of New Orleans 165 So. 2d 9 La. 1964
  • Baddock v. Louisiana State Department of Highways 142 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    * * * ” , , at page 899, on rehearing, the Court stated: “In 1934 the Federal government enacted the Federal Declaratory Judg *453 ments Act, 28 U.S.C.A.
  • Poynter v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 140 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    the Supreme Court of this State said: "Therefore a declaratory action generally cannot be maintained unless it involves some specific adversary question or controversy asserted by interested parties and based on an existing state of facts, and a declaration of rights must be refused if the issue prese
  • Guerriero v. City of Monroe 136 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    We think it is now established by the jurisprudence of this State that our courts will not entertain an action for declaratory relief unless and until the question presented is real and not theoretical, the ground for this pronouncement being that courts are not required under the Declaratory Judgment Act to give advisory opinions upon abstract questions; , ; State v. Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State University, etc., 228 La.
  • Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 132 So. 2d 845 La. 1961
    (on rehearing), and numerous authorities there cited.
  • Rogers v. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY EXAM. 126 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Burton v. Lester, supra; State v. Board of Supervisors, supra; Tugwell v. Members of Board of Highways, 1955, , .
  • McGuffy v. Weil 125 So. 2d 154 La. 1960
    State v. Board of Supervisors, 228 La.
  • Erath Sugar Co. v. Broussard 120 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    It has been decided that the statute may not be invoked unless there is a justiciable controversy ( , and State v. Board of Supervisors, etc., 228 La.
  • Orleans Parish School Board v. Campbell 126 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    ( , and State v. Board of Supervisors, etc., 228 La.
  • Orleans Parish School Board v. City of New Orleans 116 So. 2d 509 La. 1959
    It has been decided that the statute may not be invoked unless there is a justiciable controversy ( , and State v. Board of Supervisors, etc., 228 La.
  • Superior Oil Co. v. Reily 100 So. 2d 888 La. 1958
    678 , , and State v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, 228 La.
  • Theodos v. Bossier City 95 So. 2d 825 La. 1957
  • State v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ETC. 84 So. 2d 597 La. 1955
    In a very recent case on this subject, , , it was stated on rehearing: “In order for courts to entertain an action for declaratory relief, however, it is well settled in other jurisdictions that there must be a justiciable controversy, and the question presented for judicial decision must be real and not theoretical, as courts do not give advi