DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Charles Tolmas, Inc. v. Police Jury of the Parish, 90 So. 2d 65.

16 citing documents.

  • Deumite v. State 692 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Charles Tolmas, , (1956).
  • Campbell v. Pasternack Holding Co., Inc. 625 So. 2d 477 La. 1993
    19 , (1964); Charles Tolmas, , (1956); Credon v. H.G.
  • Touchard v. Williams 617 So. 2d 885 La. 1993
    19 , (1964); Charles Tolmas, , (1956); Cendon v. H.G.
  • Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov't 567 So. 2d 1097 La. 1990
    19 , (1964); Charles Tolmas, , (1956); Cendon v. H.G.
  • Rajnowski v. St. Patrick's Hosp. 564 So. 2d 671 La. 1990
    19 , (1964); Charles Tolmas, , (1956); Cendon v. H.G.
  • Automated Building Corp. v. City of Bossier City 530 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Charles Tolmos, , (1956); Babi-neaux v. Judiciary Commission, 341 So.
  • Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. Pitcher 368 So. 2d 994 La. 1979
    1019 , (1958); Charles Tolmas, , (1956); DeBouchel v. Louisiana Highway Commission, et al., 172 La.
  • Saizan v. Saizan 311 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Charles Tolmas, , (1956).
  • Vermilion Parish School Board v. Broussard 254 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    The plaintiff attempted to support this point by citing the *701 case of Charles Tolmas, , (1956), which stated that the landowners should receive notice of police jury action in expropriation.
  • Marshall v. Caddo Parish Police Jury 252 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    296 , and Charles Tolmas, , , that sufficient notice must be accorded a landowner to render the statutory authority of a police jury to appropriate property for a road constitutional.
  • Audubon Coin & Stamp Co. v. Alford Safe & Lock Co. 230 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Rader v. Rader, La.App., , Charles Tolmas, , .
  • Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Lasseigne 220 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    In Charles Tolmas, , , the police jury actually, physically *470 took possession with resistance by the landowner and without prior payment, the court held that the taking was illegal and was required to be put aside because of the failure to comply with the provisions of the Constitution that require that property shall not
  • Merritt v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 160 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Montgomery v. Beaubeuef 124 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    2nd Cir., 1956, ; Tolmas, Inc. v. Police Jury, 1956, , .
  • State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. MacAluso 106 So. 2d 455 La. 1958
    914 , or without notice and an opportunity to be heard, Charles Tolmas, Inc., v. Police Jury, , , were indeed (as respondents argue) held violative of the State constitutional provisions relied upon by respondents.
  • Williams v. Department of Highways 92 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    before the public taking, holding void for this reason a police jury taking of private property for road purposes when payment was not tendered until sixteen days after the taking; and further holding that "notice and an opportunity to be heard and to defend in an orderly proceeding" are constitutional requisites to afford due process before such taking, Charles Tolmas, Inc., v. Police Jury, La., , at page 68.