Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jais v. Department of Finance, 82 So. 2d 689.

16 citing documents.

City of Alexandria v. Kendall Dixon 196 So. 3d 592 La. 2016
143, (1958); So.2d 689 (1955); Gervias v. New Orleans Department of Police, 226 La.
Adams v. Department of Police 7 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Fuller v. Department of Fire 968 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
143, 159-60 , (1958); , (1955); Gervais v. New Orleans Dept. of Police, 226 La.
Kirsch v. New Orleans Police Department 859 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
143 , (1958); , (1955); Gervais v. New Orleans Police Department, 226 La.
Roby v. Department of Finance 496 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
143 , (1958); , (1955); Gervais v. New Orleans Department of Police, 226 La.
Walters v. Dept. of Police of New Orleans 454 So. 2d 106 La. 1984
143 , (1958); , (1955); Gervais v. New Orleans Department of Police, 226 La.
McDaniel v. Department of Safety & Permits 270 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
We are without authority to examine into the question of the sufficiency thereof.” , ; Marchese v. New Orleans Police Department, 226 La.
Smith v. Louisiana State Board of Health 201 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
982 , ; , ; Barclay v. Department of Commerce and Industry, 228 La.
Paternostro v. New Orleans Police Department 159 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
982 , ; , ; Barclay v. Department of Commerce and Industry, 228 La.
Nuss v. New Orleans Police Department 149 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
779 , ; , ; Marchese v. New Orleans Police Department, supra; Gervais v. New Orleans Police Department, supra; Konen v. New Orleans Police Department, supra.
Bonnette v. Louisiana State Penitentiary 148 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
dismissal was predicated on reports of misconduct and the notice failed to specify dates, times and places but apparently insufficiency of notice was not made an issue therein.
Carr v. New Orleans Police Department 144 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Jais v. Dept. of Finance, 1955, , .
Leggett v. Northwestern State College 140 So. 2d 5 La. 1962
982 , ; , ; Barclay v. Department of Commerce and Industry, 228 La.
Hays v. Wild Life and Fisheries Commission 136 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
779 , ; , ; Domas v. Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor, 227 La.
Jordan v. New Orleans Police Department 95 So. 2d 607 La. 1957
Broussard v. State Industrial School for Colored Youths 90 So. 2d 73 La. 1956
The fact that the letter states it would appear under these ■ circumstances she was “probably guilty of bigamy” neither required that she be proved guilty of the crime of bigamy as known to our law ( , ) nor that she disprove the probability that she was guilty of bigamy, even though under the law she carried the burden of proof as to the facts.