Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thomas v. Checker Cab Co. of New Orleans, Inc., 87 So. 2d 605.

33 citing documents.

Cloney v. Smith 441 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
as authority for finding that Mrs. Cloney was not negligent.
Jackson v. Continental Casualty Company 308 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
4th Cir. 1971); , (1956)."
Mitchell v. Employers Commercial Union Insurance 303 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Camet v. Guillot 291 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
App. 4th Cir. 1971); , (1956).
Nagem v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 280 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Nagem had a right to assume Keene was traveling at a lawful speed.” , (1956), where the plaintiff, who was the unfavored motorist, was struck at an intersection by a taxi cab which was traveling at an excessive speed on the right of way street.
Crandall v. Enterprise Electric, Inc. 277 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
To avoid confusion we observe that a , (1956), (La.App.
Barry v. Billac 250 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
3rd Cir. 1966); , (1956).
Pierce v. Coltraro 252 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Howell v. Hawthorne 240 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. v. Rayford 199 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Co. v. Taylor 193 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Steiner v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 182 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
(1956) and the cases cited therein.
Audubon Insurance v. Mauffray 176 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
“A. — About the middle of the block.” , , as authority that Mrs. Morrow was guilty of negligence in not permitting him to complete the crossing after he had entered North Claiborne from the “Stop” sign.
Hand v. Reid 169 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Andrea v. Hicks, La.App.
Roy v. United Gas Corporation 163 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
With regard to Mrs. Roy's duty under the present facts, , .
Voebel v. Hanemann 154 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
See Thomas v. Checker Cab Company of New Orleans, Inc., , .
Shipley v. Schittone 148 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Counsel for plaintiffs also relies upon the case of Thomas v. Checker Cab Co. of New Orleans, 1956, , .
Moffett v. Marquette Casualty Co. 141 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
omobile out of his range of vision approaching from that direction its operator would be driving at lawful rate of speed and in proper manner, and thus the motorist acted as a reasonably careful and prudent person when he entered intersection and proceeded across street, and motorist, whose automobile collided with defendants’ high speed taxicab, was not contributorily negligent.” See Syllabus 2, , (1956).
Smith v. Borchers 138 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
In support thereof they cite the cases of Wilson v. Williams, La.App., ; Stevens v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., ; Gauthier v. Fogleman, La.App., ; Casse v. Davis, La.App., ; , 87 So.
Dark v. Brinkman 136 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Smith v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 128 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
In support of this position, defendants cite several cases including Thomas v. Checker Cab Co., 1956, , ; and Commercial Credit Corporation v. Morris, La.App.
Hoffpauir v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 124 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
993 , ; Thomas v. Checker Cab Company of New Orleans, 1956, , .
Emmco Insurance Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co. 119 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Counsel for Pitti has cited us to Thomas v. Checker Cab Company of New Orleans, Inc., , , and Booth v. Columbia Casualty Company, 227 La.
Keystone Automobile Club Casualty Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America 117 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
ut of his range of vision approaching from that direction its operator would be driving at lawful rate of speed and in proper manner, and thus the motorist *312 acted as a reasonably careful and prudent person -when lie entered intersection and proceeded across street, and motorist, wliose automobile collided with defendants’ high speed taxicab, was not con-tributorily negligent.” See Syllabus 2, , (1956).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 111 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Thomas v. Checker Cab Co. of New Orleans, Inc., , ; Keith v. Royal Indemnity Co., La.App., ; St.
Steele Ex Rel. Steele v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 105 So. 2d 222 La. 1958
wherein, under the circumstances of the intersectional accident there involved, we held that the plaintiff-motorist, after stopping at a stop sign, looking and ascertaining that there was no apparent danger, had the right of way over a vehicle approaching from his right, even though this vehicle was b
Abadie v. Loubat 97 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
the Supreme Court held that the driver of a vehicle on a favored street “was not called upon to anticipate that a vehicle approaching from his right would be operated at an unlawful rate of speed and in an improper manner.” We paraphrase this statement by saying that the taxicab on the favored st
Guillory v. Frank 95 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
932 , ; , ; Miller v. Abshire, La.App., ; Blashfield, Section 991.
U-Drive-It Car Co. v. Ward 94 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Even if the facts were exactly as stated by Ward, , , confidently relied upon by counsel for Ward.
Rizley v. Cutrer 95 So. 2d 139 La. 1957
938 , , ) the case will be remanded to the Court of Appeal for the fixing of the amount of damages to which plaintiff is entitled.
Starnes v. Mury 90 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Booth v. Columbia Casualty Company, 227 La.
Thomas v. Checker Cab Co. of New Orleans 90 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Snodgrass v. Centanni 87 So. 2d 127 La. 1956
403 , and cases therein cited, and Thomas v. Checker Cab Co. of New Orleans, Inc., , .)