DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harrell, 82 So. 2d 701.

17 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    915, So.2d 701 (La.1955).
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Delcambre 710 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    915 , (1960) (the prosecutor’s compelling the defendant to testify in front of the grand jury relative to the crimes charged against him justifies quashing the indictment); , (1955).
  • State v. Walker 567 So. 2d 581 La. 1990
    915 , (1960) (the prosecutor's compelling the defendant to testify in front of the grand jury relative to the crimes charged against him justifies quashing the indictment); , (1955).
  • State v. Johnson 432 So. 2d 815 La. 1983
    915, 921 , (1960) (on rehearing); -39 , -04 (1955); State ex rel.
  • State v. Johnson 393 So. 2d 1255 La. 1981
  • State v. Wallace 321 So. 2d 349 La. 1975
    (1955) and State v. Jemison, 240 La.
  • State v. Sinclair 245 So. 2d 365 La. 1971
    In capital cases, Article 844 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure relaxes the requirement of a formal hill of exceptions to this extent: “[T]he appellate court, to promote the ends of justice, may consider bills that have not been timely signed *89 by the judge.” , .
  • State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
    336 , (1970); , (1955); State v. Wilson, 109 *769 La.
  • State v. Reed 209 So. 2d 730 La. 1968
  • State v. Callahan 172 So. 2d 668 La. 1965
  • Callahan v. New Orleans Police Department 171 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
  • State v. Litton 168 So. 2d 105 La. 1964
    787 , ; , ; State v. Smalling, 240 La.
  • State v. Kimberlin 165 So. 2d 279 La. 1964
    and State v. Jemison, 240 La.
  • State v. Smalling 125 So. 2d 409 La. 1960
    An indictment (or information) is the foundation of a criminal prosecution ( , ); and when a person is compelled to give testimony of a self-incriminating nature before a grand jury investigating bribery “such testimony shall not afterwards be used against him in any judicial proceedings, except for perjury in giving such testimony.” (Article XIX, Section 13, of the Louisiana Cons
  • State v. Jemison 125 So. 2d 363 La. 1960
  • State v. Smalling 125 So. 2d 399 La. 1960