Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bean v. Higgins, Inc., 88 So. 2d 30.

25 citing documents.

Irvine v. Sentry Ins. Co. 415 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Griffin v. Hochendel 263 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , .
Williams v. Hudson East 261 So. 2d 629 La. 1972
747 , (1957); Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , (1956); Brannon v. Zurich General Accident and Liability Ins.
Broussard v. Frank Tea & Spice Co. 250 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , (1956).
Smith v. Travelers Insurance Company 174 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Lawes v. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Co., cited above; Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., cited above; , ; Anderson v. Rowan Drilling Co., La.App.
Occhipinti v. Marquette Casualty Company 158 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , cf. Trahan v. Louisiana State Rice Milling Co., La.App.
Parish v. Standard Accident Insurance Company 158 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
See also Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , (welder's helper unable to work without pain).
Thomas v. Gates, Inc. 157 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
161 , ; Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , ; Emilien v. National Gypsum Company, supra; Murphy v. American General Insurance Company, La.App.
Darden v. Henry E. Johnson, Inc. 145 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , ; Monk v. Louisiana Forestry Commission, La.App., .
Harris v. Argonaut Insurance Company 142 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , ; Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 196 La.
Murry v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Company 136 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Viator v. Hub City Contractors, Inc., La.App.
Schram v. Lake Charles Ready-Mix, Inc. 125 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
(Italics ours) As stated in Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , "* * * The test of total and permanent disability is whether the injured employee is capable of performing the work of the occupation in which he was engaged at the time of injury or whether he is able to do the kind of work he is trained to do or customarily does in the usual and customary way and
Hunter v. Continental Casualty Co. 126 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , ; Wright v. National Surety Corp., 221 La.
Monk v. Louisiana Forestry Commission 124 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
The test of total and permanent disability, as approved in Bean v. Higgins, Inc. and Columbia Casualty Company, 1956, , , is: "* * * whether the injured employee is capable of performing the work or the occupation in which he was engaged at the time of injury or whether he is able to do the kind of work he is trained to do or customarily does in the usual and customary way and without any serious impairment of his cap
Shaw v. F. & C. Engineering Co. 120 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
nclusive proof * * * ‘By a preponderance of evidence is meant simply evidence which is of greater weight, or more convincing, than that which is offered in opposition to it.’ ” Similarly reversing a lower court which had limited a claimant’s recovery based upon a greater number of *528 medical witnesses testifying in opposition to his claim, the Supreme Court also stated in Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , 32: “Mere numerical numbers of [medical] experts is not sufficient for a determination of a deci
Scarborough v. Nichols Construction Co. 110 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
In the case of Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , a , decided by this Court, the test to be applied in reaching a conclusion as to what constitutes permanent and total disability is as follows: “The test of total and permanent disability is whether the i
Vidrine v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance 103 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , .
Green v. Harper 103 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
538 , ; Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , ; Young v. Central Surety & Insurance Corp., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., .
Ceasar v. Calcasieu Paper Company 102 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
747 , , and Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , that a laborer unable to perform without substantial pain the heavy duties of the type of employment in which he sustained an accident is permanently and totally disabled within the meaning and contemplation of the compensation statute.
McGee v. Reimers-Schneider Co. 102 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , cf. Trahan v. Louisiana State Rice Milling Co., La.App.
Trahan v. Louisiana State Rice Milling Company 100 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Furthermore, in Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , the Court said: "`* * * The test of total and permanent disability is whether the injured employee is capable of performing the work or the occupation in which he was engaged at the time of injury or whether he is able to do the kind of work he is trained to do or customarily does in the usual and
Guillory v. Coal Operators Casualty Company 95 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
See, e. g., Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , .
Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Co. 93 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
And the inability to do heavy work requiring lifting or straining without pain, constitutes total disability for a laborer, Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , .
Jackson v. Steel Fabricators 90 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Were it not for the decision of our Supreme Court in Bean v. Higgins, Inc., , , we would be content to say that only a question of fact is involved, i. e., whether plaintiff, as a result of the impairment, is disabled and we would have found it difficult to say that, in deciding that question of fact as he did, the District Judge was manifestly in error.
Fourchea v. Maloney Trucking and Storage 88 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
In its opinion in Bean v. Higgins, Inc. (Columbia Casualty Company) , , the Supreme Court said: "* * * Mere numerical numbers of experts is not sufficient for a determination of a decision in any case.