DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Pope, 89 So. 2d 894.

19 citing documents.

  • Succession of Raymond John Brandt La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    The interest may come in the form of being named as executor of the estate, see Kilpatrick, supra, or as attorney for a succession, So.2d 894 (La.
  • Succession of Joseph Ames Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The interest may come in the form of being named as executor of the estate, see Kilpatrick, supra, or as attorney for a succession, So.2d 894 (La.1956), or gaining an interest as an heir or legatee.
  • Succession of Guidry 945 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    The interest may come in the form of being named as executor of the estate, see Kilpatrick, supra, or as attorney for a succession, , or gaining an interest as an heir or legatee.
  • Overruled In Re Succession of Wolf 943 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    One of those cases, , (1956), was overruled by the Louisiana Supreme Court in
  • In Re Succession of Smith 806 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • Succession of Ruppert 602 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Succession of Daigle 601 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    In , [1] , a case involving a *14 similar set of circumstances, our Supreme Court reasoned as follows: "...
  • Succession of Wallace 574 So. 2d 348 La. 1991
    1008 , (1953); , (1956); and
  • Arsht v. Davis 550 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    The interest may come in the *376 form of being named as executor of the estate, see Kilpatrick, supra, or as attorney for a succession, , or gaining an interest as an heir or legatee.
  • Estate of Mallet v. Mallet 527 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    The interest may come in the form of being named as executor of the estate, see Kilpatrick, supra, or as attorney for a succession, , or gaining an interest as an heir or legatee.
  • Succession of Jenkins 481 So. 2d 607 La. 1986
    at 1057 , at 897 (1956).
  • Succession of Boyenga 437 So. 2d 260 La. 1983
  • Succession of Boyenga 424 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    (1956), concluded that the designated attorney had a real interest but did not explain its nature.
  • Succession of Kilpatrick 356 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
    In , (1956), the court held that an attorney, named as attorney for the succession in a will which he claimed to be the last valid will left by decedent, had a real interest (his fee) in having the earlier will probated and hence a real interest in assailing the validity of the later will.
  • Howard v. Gunter 215 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    In , (1956), it was complained that the notary, the witnesses, and the testator had not signed in the presence of each other.
  • Succession of Guidry 160 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Therefore, cases cited by plaintiff dealing with the rigid technical requirements for a valid nuncupative will by public act under the Civil Code are not pertinent to the will in the case before us. Plaintiff did cite , , which dealt with a will under LSA-R.S.
  • Viola v. Story 160 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Therefore, cases cited by plaintiff dealing with the rigid technical requirements for a valid nuncupative will by public act under the Civil Code are not pertinent to the will in the case before us. Plaintiff did cite , , which dealt with a will under LSA-R.S.
  • Succession of Zatarain 138 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    743 , ; , ; Succession of Toombs, 167 La.
  • Succession of Eck 98 So. 2d 181 La. 1957
    *769 In reasons for judgment, the trial judge held that the will of 1956, supra, failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of the statute and was invalid under , .