Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thigpen v. Thigpen, 91 So. 2d 12.

48 citing documents.

  • LeGardeur v. Coleman 131 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (1956), rev’d. on other grounds by Fowler v. Fowler, 03-0590 (La.12/12/03), ; (La.App.
  • Fowler v. Fowler 861 So. 2d 181 La. 2003
    (1956) and hold that life insurance proceeds received by a spouse during the existence of a matrimonial regime of acquets and gains are separate property.
  • Fowler v. Fowler 834 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    (1956), that since a policy of life insurance was issued during the existence of the (second) marriage, the proceeds of the policy were part of the community of that (second) marriage.
  • Succession of Moran 535 So. 2d 369 La. 1988
  • Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
    (1956); Phillips v. Phillips, 160 La.
  • Robinson v. Robinson 524 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the husband bought a diamond ring with community funds, gave it to his wife, and the wife argued that the ring was her separate property.
  • Guillory v. Jim Tatman's Mobile Homes, Inc. 490 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Howes v. Howes 436 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    (1956); Oliphint v. Oliphint, 219 La.
  • Hill v. Hill 434 So. 2d 1078 La. 1983
  • Auger v. Auger 434 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    See Auger v. Auger, supra; , (1956).
  • D'ANGELO v. Poche 434 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Katz v. Katz 423 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Prentice Oil and Gas Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 421 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    1085 , (1959); , (1956).
  • Richard v. Thompson 411 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Rev., 430 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1970); , (1956).
  • Vaughn v. Coco 409 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Trahan v. Trahan 387 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    in which our Supreme Court faced a similar situation.
  • Hall v. Allred 385 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    The Court agrees that rescission is not available as a remedy for this plaintiff, , (1956), and this contention is dismissed.
  • Auger v. Auger 381 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Cook v. Ed Francis Chevrolet, Inc. 365 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    (1956); Cain v. Employers Casualty Co., 236 La.
  • Phillips v. Nereaux 357 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    (1956) held: "The law does not give to a wife, who has sustained injury by a conveyance of community property in fraud of her rights, a right of action for rescission of the transaction—such as the revocatory action available to creditors for the purpose of setting aside the fraudulent conveyance of thei
  • Henry v. Newman 351 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • State Dept. of Highways v. Terrebonne 349 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    1085 , (1959); , (1956).
  • Oil Purchasers, Inc. v. Kuehling 321 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Town of Logansport v. Copley 313 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Sokol v. Bob McKinnon Chevrolet, Inc. 307 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    [6] , ; Travelers Insurance Company v. Jenkins, La.App., ; Watkins v. Abshire, La.App., ; Williams v. Ralph R. Miller Shows, La.App., .
  • Robichaux v. Robichaux 289 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    1085 , ; , ; Massey v. Consumer’s Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
  • Travelers Insurance Company v. Jenkins 285 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    See also, , ; Williams v. Ralph Miller Shows, La.App., .
  • Succession of Feist 274 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    361 (1902); , (1956); (8) Therefore the insurer's earlier 100% payment (for the wrong reason) to the wife's heir would have legally discharged 75% of its obligation, since the wife owned half and inherited half of her husband's half of the proceeds; (9) Therefore the husband's parents (and siblings) would not be entit
  • Succession of Mendoza 288 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    the Supreme Court held: "An analysis of the jurisprudence reveals that, where life insurance is taken out in favor of the insured's estate, or of his executors, administrators or assigns, the status of the proceeds of such life insurance, i. e., whether separate or community property, depends upon whet
  • Malone v. Malone 243 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    Uchello v. Uchello, 220 La.
  • Broyles v. Broyles 215 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    This article, , (1956), provides that a husband who has sold or disposed of community property by fraud, to injure his wife, is liable to the wife for one half of the value of the property disposed of.
  • Gouaux v. Gouaux 211 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    (1956), but where it can be shown that the money derived from separate funds, though commingled, was used to benefit the community, the claim for indebtedness should be allowed.
  • Tooley v. Pennison 208 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    Our Civil Code, article 2403, provides that debts contracted during the marriage must be acquitted out of the community estate; , (23); Tanner v. Tanner, 229 La.
  • Jennings v. Walker 206 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    612 (1899); , ; and Cahow v. Hughes, 169 So.
  • Bynacker v. McMichael 205 So. 2d 433 La. 1967
  • Herman v. Jambois 205 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    1085 , ; , ; Massey v. Consumer's Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
  • Succession of Videau 197 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
  • Pennison v. Pennison 187 So. 2d 747 La. 1966
    Uchello v. Uchello, 220 La.
  • Tooley v. Pennison 187 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Appellant James J. Morrison has filed an application for rehearing contending: (1) , , applicant, in his own right as a creditor of the community, has a valid claim against the community for his attorney’s fees; and (2) Thigpen is contrary to our statement that the only instances (we have been able to find) in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in which the community was required to
  • International Union of Operating Engineers v. Guy Scroggins, Inc. 168 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    593 , (syllabi 16, 17), or -of a finding by the trial court under the •eye of which the services were performed as to the reasonable valuation thereof, cf., , (syllabus 29) this appellate court will non-suit plaintiff’s claim in this regard.” Because of the above cited cases and the -evidence in the instant case, this Court can•not allow defendant attorneys’ fees on this "hearing; and this claim is dismissed as of -nonsuit.
  • Hodges v. Hodges 150 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    206 , , in which he correctly states in his brief that “the court held that the wife, who has sustained injury by a conveyance of community property in fraud of her rights, does not have a right of action for rescission of the transaction, such as the revoca-tory action available to creditors for the purpose of setting asid
  • Udstad v. Fertel 148 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Pierce v. Atlantic Refining Company 140 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    593 , (syllabi 16, 17), or of a finding by the trial court under the eye of which the services were performed as to the reasonable valuation thereof, cf., , (syllabus 29) this appellate court will nonsuit plaintiff's claim in this regard.
  • Broussard v. Broussard 132 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • Fontenot v. Himel 124 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    the appellant contended that the Lower Court erred in awarding defendants attorney fees, as there was no evidence in the record to show the value of the services rendered by the defense counsel.
  • Azar v. Azar 120 So. 2d 485 La. 1960
  • Watkins v. Abshire 108 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    54 .” The Supreme Court, , , at page 24, said: “Plaintiff contends that the judge erred in awarding defendant’s attorneys a fee of $1,000 to be charged against the community assets.
  • Thomas W. Hooley & Sons v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance 103 So. 2d 449 La. 1958
    593 , (syllabi 16, 17), or of a finding by the trial court under the eye of which the services were performed as to the reasonable valuation thereof, cf., , (syllabus 29) this appellate court will non-suit plaintiff’s claim in this regard.