DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Daigre v. Daigre, 89 So. 2d 41.

17 citing documents.

  • Durden v. Durden 165 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    -482 , -45 (1956); (La.App.
  • Succession of Jenkins 936 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    4th Cir.10/12/89), , (1956), stating that “[p]iecemeal partition *272 of property acquired during marriage and settlement of claims arising from matrimonial regimes after termination of the community has long been prohibited.” 2 It would appear to be in the best interest of all parties for the trial court to continue the sus
  • Skinner v. Skinner 558 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    Johnson v. Johnson, supra; Hall v. Hall, supra; , (1956).” Inasmuch as this proceeding was not conducted in compliance with La.R.S.
  • Nunez v. Nunez 552 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Hicks v. Hicks 497 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Johnson v. Johnson, supra; Hall v. Hall, supra; , (1956).
  • Johnson v. Johnson 473 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    3rd Cir.1978); , (1956).
  • Lee v. Lee 375 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Pollock v. Pollock Engineering Co., Inc. 365 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    *1189 , (1956) that piecemeal partition of the community of acquets and gains is not allowed.
  • Smith v. Hebert 348 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    2403, 2409; , ; De-moruelle v. Allen, 218 La.
  • Brown v. Hunter 348 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    472 , (1956); Tomme v. Tomme, 174 La.
  • Scott v. Scott 331 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Lester v. Lester 245 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    901 (1932); , (1956); and Pennison v. Pennison, 249 La.
  • Joubert v. Sylvester 230 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Sciortino v. Sciortino 188 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Pennison v. Pennison 187 So. 2d 747 La. 1966
    2403, 2409; , ; Demoruellc v. Allen, 218 La.
  • Fleury v. Fleury 131 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Smith v. Marino, La.App., , rehearing denied La.App., ; , .
  • Coney v. Coney 89 So. 2d 326 La. 1956
    This conclusion is also in keeping with our decision in Daigre v. Daigre, La., , in which we dealt with the problem of the settlement of a community *825 on a “piece meal” basis and there pointed out the undesirability of such a practice.