Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters, 89 So. 2d 399.

57 citing documents.

Williams v. American Employers Insurance 103 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Despite this stipulation, which would have the effect of indicating the employee’s wages as having been $40 per week, , , enunciated as follows: “After determining an employee’s daily wage, the six day week is to be employed in calculating his weekly wage.” It follows that the computation of weekly benefits in the instant case must be based upon a potential weekly wage of $48.
Parker v. General Earthwork Service 103 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Spurlock v. American Automobile Insurance Co., supra; , .
Spurlock v. American Automobile Insurance 101 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
the Supreme Court was faced with a situation resembling that which confronts us. There penalties and attorney’s fees were demanded on the charge that compensation had been discontinued arbitrarily, capriciously *772 and without probable cause.
Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 99 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
In the Carrington case, , , the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court on rehearing spelled out the approved formula in words of such clarity and certainty as to prevent any possible future misinterpretation: "After determining an employee's daily wage, the six day week is to be employed in calculating his weekly wage.
Guillory v. Coal Operators Casualty Company 95 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Troquille v. Lacaze's Estate, 222 La.
Davis v. Reynolds 96 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
White v. Calcasieu Paper Company 96 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Based upon a six-day week, , , sixty-five per cent of these wages exceeds the then-applicable maximum weekly compensation rate of $30.