Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lea, 84 So. 2d 169.

23 citing documents.

State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
State v. Devore 309 So. 2d 325 La. 1975
145 , (1958); , (1955), cert.
State v. Breston 304 So. 2d 313 La. 1974
1094 , (1960); , (1955).
State v. Daniels 263 So. 2d 859 La. 1972
State v. Pesson 235 So. 2d 568 La. 1970
State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
1094 , (defendant's oral statements); , (oral confession); State v. Shourds, 224 La.
State v. Brumfield 229 So. 2d 76 La. 1969
123 , 5 L.Ed.2d 98 ; , , cert.
State v. Crook 221 So. 2d 473 La. 1969
1094 , (defendant’s oral statements) ; , (oral confession) ; State v. Shourds, 224 La.
State v. Hall 218 So. 2d 320 La. 1969
1094 , (defendant’s oral statements); , (oral confession); State v. Shourds, 224 La.
State v. Manuel 217 So. 2d 369 La. 1968
123 , 5 L.Ed.2d 98 ; , , cert.
State v. Lewis 199 So. 2d 907 La. 1967
841 , ; , ; State v. Smith, 216 La.
State v. Hunter 195 So. 2d 273 La. 1967
1094 , (defendant’s oral statements); , (oral confession) ; State v. Shourds, 224 La.
State v. Brown 186 So. 2d 576 La. 1966
1094 , ; , ; State v. Shourds, 224 La.
State v. Simien 178 So. 2d 266 La. 1965
State v. Clifton 172 So. 2d 657 La. 1965
2043 (1946); , (1955), cert.
State v. Clifton 172 So. 2d 657 La. 1965
2043 (1946); , (1955), cert.
State v. Pailet 165 So. 2d 294 La. 1964
212 , (evidence produced at grand jury hearing); , (oral confession) and State v. Bickham, 239 La.
State v. McAllister 150 So. 2d 557 La. 1963
“ * * * The sequestration of witnesses is within the sound discretion of the court and this Court has on numerous occasions held that a verdict of a jury will not be set aside in the absence of any showing of an abuse of this discretion.” , ; 350 U.S. 1007 , 76 S.Ct.
State v. Rideau 137 So. 2d 283 La. 1962
State v. Brazile, supra; , and the cases therein cited.
State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
The sequestration of witnesses is within the sound discretion of the court and this Court has on numerous occasions held that a verdict of a jury will not be set aside in the absence of any showing of an abuse of this discretion.” , ; certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 1007 , 76 S.Ct.
State v. Bickham 121 So. 2d 207 La. 1960
State v. Martinez, 220 La.
State v. Miller 111 So. 2d 108 La. 1959
691 , ; , ; State v. Goins, 232 La.
State v. Brazile 99 So. 2d 62 La. 1958
172 this court said: “ * * * A new trial should not be granted because some witness or prospective juror happens to make some statement that is completely unresponsive to any question propounded to him and for which neither counsel nor the court are in the slightest measure responsible.