State v. Marcotte
State v. Marcotte, 86 So. 2d 186 (La. 1956).
Cited by
- State v. Roussel 266 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Jessie M. Griffin, II 180 So. 3d 1262 La. 2015
- State v. Bailey 969 So. 2d 610 La. 2007
- State v. King 956 So. 2d 562 La. 2007
- Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Perez 379 So. 2d 1373 La. 1980
- State v. Snyder 237 So. 2d 392 La. 1970
- State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
- State v. Fitzgerald 179 So. 2d 906 La. 1965
- State v. Cox 167 So. 2d 352 La. 1964
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Boasberg 124 La. 289
- State v. Tate 185 La. 1006
Opinion text
*549 HAWTHORNE, Justice (dissenting). The causes for recusation of a district attorney are set forth in Article 310 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and it has been said by this court that a district attorney cannot recuse himself or be recused except for the causes provided by law. See State v. Boasberg, 124 La. 289 , 50 So. 162 . The allegations of defendant’s motion to recuse the district attorney in the instant case do not fall within any of the causes of recusation enumerated in Article 310, and consequently I think the trial judge was correct in overruling the motion to recuse. Furthermore, I do not subscribe to the holding of this court in State v. Tate, 185 La. 1006 , 171 So. 108 . I therefore respectfully dissent.