DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Prince v. Hopson, 89 So. 2d 128.

38 citing documents.

  • Succession Of Willie Clyde Burns La. 2022
  • Succession of Willie C. Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
    Instead, the court applied the putative community rule, giving one-half to the good-faith husband’s heirs and one-fourth each to the legal and putative wives, So.
  • Succession of David Jones, Jr. A/K/A David Jones, III A/K/A David Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2 Cir. 1984), writ denied, citing the supreme court’s So.2d 128 (1956), divided the community property so that the legal and putative spouses each received a one- fourth interest and the decedent’s heirs received a one-half interest.
  • In Re Succession of Jones 6 So. 3d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    2 Cir.1984), writ denied, citing the supreme court’s , (1956), divided the community property so that the legal and putative spouses each received a one-fourth interest and the decedent’s heirs received a one-half interest.
  • Talbot v. Talbot 864 So. 2d 590 La. 2003
    Through the years, however, , (1956), requiring a spouse to prove the separate nature of his or her property by a "strict, clear, positive and legally certain" standard, or stated more traditionally, the clear and convincing standard.
  • Salley v. Salley 647 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Succession of Dove 597 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • In Re Succession of Gordon 461 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Tullier v. Tullier 450 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    4th Cir.1980); and (4) “clear strict and legally certain”
  • Matter of Succession of Martin 424 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Luchsinger v. Boettner 388 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Perkins v. Ray 365 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
  • Phillips v. Nereaux 357 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    490 , (1960); , (1956); Rousseau v. Rousseau, 209 La.
  • Price v. Price 326 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • King v. Cancienne 316 So. 2d 366 La. 1975
    Texas Co. v. Stewart, supra ; , (1956); Succession of Fields, 222 La.
  • Primeaux v. Libersat 307 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    301 , (1970); , (1956); (La.App.
  • Succession of Broussard 306 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1956); Succession of Smith, 247 La.
  • Nelson v. Nelson 311 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Southwest Natural Production Company v. Anderson, 239 La.
  • Cortes v. Fleming 307 So. 2d 611 La. 1974
    Texas Co. v. Stewart, supra; , (1956); Succession of Fields, 222 La.
  • Succession of Pittman 282 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    747 ], , Prince v. Hopson [ ], , Monk v. Monk [ 243 La.
  • Succession of Milton 278 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Cortes v. Fleming 267 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Succession of Elrod v. Elrod 218 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    429 , (1962); , (1956); Succession of Franek, 224 La.
  • Hollier v. Fontenot 216 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    Nevertheless, the community is deemed to be adequately protected by the strong presumption in favor of its community characterization, Civil Code Article 2405, with a heavy burden of proof required to show otherwise, , .
  • Succession of Barr 203 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    429 , ; , , and jurisprudence there referred to.” LSA-C.C.
  • Succession of Choyce 183 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
  • Levy v. Joseph 180 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    429 , ; , , and jurisprudence there referred to.
  • Britt v. Tisby 164 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    2334, 2402; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Succession of Hollier 158 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Southwest Natural Production Company v. Anderson, 239 La.
  • Melancon v. Sonnier 157 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Succession of Verrett, 224 La.
  • Airhart v. Airhart 153 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Art. 2402; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Bailey v. Alice C. Plantation & Refinery Inc. 152 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    837, 846 , (1954); , (1956); Graves v. United States Rubber Company, 237 La.
  • Succession of Davis 142 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    799 , (1955); , (1956), but each of these decisions involved the "innocent" party in a subsequent marriage, that is, the party who married while under no legal handicap, a situation not present in the instant case.
  • Monk v. Monk 144 So. 2d 384 La. 1962
    747 , (on rehearing); , ; Southwest Natural Production Co. v. Anderson, 239 La.
  • Succession of Blades 127 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    as follows: "When a married woman buys property in her own name, failure to make a recitation of paraphernality in the deed is not fatal, and she may overcome the presumption of community by showing (1) that the funds constituting the price paid for the property were paraphernal funds, (2) t
  • McGuffy v. Weil 125 So. 2d 154 La. 1960
    347 , ; Smith v. Smith, supra; , ; Theodos v. Bossier City, 232 La.
  • Southwest Natural Production Company v. Anderson 118 So. 2d 897 La. 1960
    as follows: “It is well settled in this state that property purchased in the name of either spouse during the existence of the community of acquets 'and gains is presumed to be community property.
  • Texas Company v. Stewart 101 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1958
    Succession of Marinoni, 183 La.