DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Abunza v. Olivier, 88 So. 2d 815.

36 citing documents.

  • Amoco Production Company v. Texas, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Amoco Production Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 876 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    399 , [(1955)]; , [(1956)].
  • Rabai v. Rabai 537 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    I ; Slater v. Culpepper, [ 233 La.
  • Kaplan v. Kaplan 522 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Arledge v. Bell 463 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Downs v. Downs 410 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Deliberto v. Deliberto 400 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    (1956); Succession of Boyer, 36 La.Ann.
  • Reynolds v. Reynolds 388 So. 2d 1135 La. 1980
  • Lane v. Lane 375 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Phillips v. Nereaux 357 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    292 , (1956); , (1956); (La.App.
  • Thomas v. Congregation of St. Sauveur Roman Catholic Church 308 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Although declaration against interest ascribed to a deceased person should be scrutinized with great care (See: , (1956)) we find the following testimony of the Rev. Paul Richard does have probative value.
  • Succession of Dukes v. Williams 285 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Yet there was neither pleading nor proof of enhancement in value, and in the absence of proof of enhancement no recovery can be had; , (1956).
  • Vicknair v. Vicknair 284 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • Wall v. Murrell 280 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1956) recognized as correct the *867 admissibility of testimony by the defendant therein to the effect that a promissory note was forgiven by the holder of the note prior to her death.
  • Blalock v. Blalock 259 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
  • Mathieu v. Williams 255 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
  • Ardoin v. LeBleu 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    103 , (1947); Abunza v. *569 Olivier, , (1956); Slater v. Culpepper, 233 La.
  • Succession of Sonnier 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    103 , (1947); Abunza v. *569 Olivier, , (1956); Slater v. Culpepper, 233 La.
  • Succession of Videau 197 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    In Provost, Ferguson, and Thigpen, , (1956), the claimant failed to overcome the obstacle and the claims were rejected.
  • Williams v. Williams 199 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    3d Cir. 1961); , ; (La.App.
  • Succession of Edmondson 192 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Giamanco v. Giamanco [La.App.], .
  • Pacholik v. Gray 187 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    292 , ; , ; cf., Micheli v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Co., La.App.
  • Ponder v. Fussell 180 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Hayward v. Carraway 180 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    839 , ; , ; Payton v. Jones, La.App., .
  • Bordelon v. Bordelon 177 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    103 , ; , ; Odom v. Odom, La.App.
  • Succession of Hollier 158 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    103 , ; , ; Odom v. Odom, La.App.
  • Smith v. Garrison 137 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    Succession of Rusciana, *508 232 La.
  • Simon v. Simon 138 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    717 , (1949); , (1956); Succession of Rusciana, 232 La.
  • Winston v. Winston 130 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Unquestionably the above represents a correct statement of the holding in the McClelland case, , , as follows: “Recovery under Article 2408 of the Civil Code is not based on the amounts expended by the community for the repair and improvement of the separate property of one of the spouses; it is limited to the enhanced value of the property resulting from the repairs and improvements.
  • Chrisentery v. Chrisentery 124 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    717 , ; , ; Abraham v. Abraham, 230 La.
  • Odom v. Odom 121 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    103 , ; Abunza v. Olivier, 1956, , .
  • Ruffino v. Hunt 99 So. 2d 34 La. 1958
  • Abraham v. Abraham 98 So. 2d 197 La. 1957
  • Slater v. Culpepper 99 So. 2d 348 La. 1957
  • Thigpen v. Thigpen 91 So. 2d 12 La. 1956
  • Coney v. Coney 89 So. 2d 326 La. 1956
    495 , ; Abraham v. Abraham, La., and Abunza v. Olivier, La., .