Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Company, 86 So. 2d 540.

17 citing documents.

Welch v. Robert Campbell, Inc. 321 So. 2d 523 La. 1975
So.2d 540 (1956), and many other decisions requiring this result in view of the paternalistic purposes of the compensation statute, including its provision that technical rules of evidence are relaxed.
Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company 245 So. 2d 151 La. 1971
(1956); Robinson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Ventress v. Danel-Ryder, Inc. 225 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Crimen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 193 So. 2d 249 La. 1966
Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Company, Inc., , , we think, is controlling of our disposition of the instant matter, the circumstances therein being substantially the same as those existing here.
Lomenick v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 189 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Gautreaux v. Harang, 190 La.
Williams v. New Orleans Paper Box Company 185 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Jackson v. International Paper Company, La.App., ; Rawls v. Dixie Drilling Company, La.App., .
Jamison v. Reese Variety Stores, Inc. 181 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Art. 2164; Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Co., Inc., , (1956) ; Jackson v. Kramer, La.App., (4th Cir.1960, cert.
Robinson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 181 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Co., Inc., , ; Washington v. Hendrix Manufacturing Co., La.
Burk v. Security Insurance 177 So. 2d 278 La. 1965
626 , (1962); , (1956); (La.App.
Jackson v. International Paper Company 163 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
App. 2 Cir., ; , ; and Rawls v. Dixie Drilling Company, La.App.
Williams v. Travelers Insurance Company 157 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
1 Cir., (although the plaintiff may have an opportunity to so show, in the event of a belated discovery thereof, see Supreme Court opinion in the same case, , ).
Chapman v. Lalumia 154 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Appellant also contends that since this is a workmen’s compensation case the rules may be relaxed and if the ends of justice require it it may be remanded to the lower court for additional proceedings, , .
James v. Acme Window Cleaners 139 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
and La.App., ; Mitchell v. Sklar, La.App., 196 So.
Washington v. Hendrix Manufacturing Co. 106 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Precedent for the remand of a case under comparable factual circumstances is found in the recent action of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in a case also involving a compensation claim, , , in which the court ordered a remand even though the motion and supporting report of a physician was not filed until after the judgment of the Court of Appeal affirming the judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit, and, indeed, after the time for filing applications for rehearing had expired.
Dupre v. Consolidated Underwriters 99 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Orleans, , certiorari denied; cf., , .
Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Company 95 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Newman v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. 87 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
2d 243 , approved by implication in Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Company, Inc., , ; see also Betz v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App.