Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 89 So. 2d 898.

27 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
Id.; see, (1956) (McCaleb., J., dissenting) (“It is not proper for counsel to interrogate 69 prospective jurors concerning their reaction to evidence which might be received at trial.”); State v. Smith, 216 La.
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
See also, (1956) (“It is not proper for counsel to interrogate prospective jurors concerning their reaction to evidence which might be received at trial.”); State v. Smith, 216 La.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Thibodeaux, 98–1673 (La.9/8/99), So.2d 898, 905 (1956).
State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , (1956).
State v. Kirk 98 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“It is not proper for counsel to interrogate prospective jurors concerning their reaction to evidence which might be received at trial.” , (1956); see also State v. Smith, 216 La.
State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“It is not proper for counsel to interrogate prospective jurors concerning their reaction to evidence which might be received at trial.” , (1956).
State v. Andrews 61 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“It is not proper for counsel to interrogate prospective jurors concerning their reaction to evidence which might be received at trial.” , (1956); see also State v. Smith, 216 La.
State v. George 4 So. 3d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“It is not proper for counsel to interrogate prospective jurors concerning their reaction to evidence which might be received at trial.” , (1956).
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State v. Taylor 875 So. 2d 58 La. 2004
(1956); see also State v. Smith, 216 La.
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , (1956).
State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
State v. Conrad 304 So. 2d 318 La. 1974
State v. Jones 282 So. 2d 422 La. 1973
1199 , 22 L.Ed.2d 460 (1969); , (1956).
State v. Harper 257 So. 2d 381 La. 1972
Consequently, as the trial judge observed, it is not proper to permit defense counsel “To ask a juror to speculate on a probability * * ” and to ask him “what his verdict would be or * * * what would influence his verdict if certain facts did or did not exist.” , , we specifically held that: “It is not proper for counsel to interrogate prospective jurors concerning their reaction to evidence which might be received at the trial.
State v. Andrus 199 So. 2d 867 La. 1967
788 , ; , ; State v. Copling, 242 La.
State v. Oliver 174 So. 2d 509 La. 1965
441 , ; , (on rehearing).
State v. Oliver 174 So. 2d 509 La. 1965
441 , ; , (on rehearing).
State v. Green 150 So. 2d 571 La. 1963
363 , ; , , and authorities cited.
State v. Copling 135 So. 2d 271 La. 1961
15:288 and 557; *207 , ; State v. Butler, 229 La.
State v. Minor 129 So. 2d 10 La. 1961
State v. Newton 128 So. 2d 651 La. 1961
758 , ; State v. Williams, Jr., , .
State v. Bickham 107 So. 2d 458 La. 1958