Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Viator, 87 So. 2d 115.

15 citing documents.

State v. Jones 983 So. 2d 95 La. 2008
Construed in this manner, consistent with ordinary rules of statutory construction, including the principle that penal statutes must be strictly construed and cannot be extended to conduct not included within the clear import of their language, , (1956), the meaning of the statute is manifest and not ambiguous, such that resort to legislative history is unnecessary.
In Re Beychok 484 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Peterson 343 So. 2d 1038 La. 1977
This act followed the 1956 , , where it was held that beer was not an “intoxicating or spirituous liquor” under R.S.
State v. Free 321 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Pratt v. Livingston Parish Police Jury 278 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
State v. Dardar 241 So. 2d 905 La. 1970
1095 , ; , ; State v. Murtes, 232 La.
Blanchard v. Gauthier 178 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
In urging adoption of the premise that “alcoholic liquors” and “intoxicating liquors” have entirely different connotations as used in the pertinent statute, , , and State v. Guimbellot, 232 La.
Gregoire v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. 158 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
State v. Deutch 161 So. 2d 730 La. 1964
605 ; , ; State v. Guimbellot, 232 La.
State v. Hightower 116 So. 2d 699 La. 1959
luence of liquor,” observed “we are of the opinion that the term ‘under the influence of liquor’ has a well-recognized meaning with every one, which is exactly synonymous with the term ‘in an intoxicated condition,’ ” and concluded that “the ordinance therefore clearly sets forth what is forbidden.” *883 The legislature in 1956, , , in amending and re-enacting R.S.
State v. Garner 115 So. 2d 855 La. 1959
3 “It has long been the unshaken rule of this State that penal statutes must be strictly construed and cannot be extended to cases not included within the clear import of its language.” , .
Bartley, Incorporated v. Town of Westlake 111 So. 2d 328 La. 1959
State v. McAlister 102 So. 2d 444 La. 1958
caused the Legislature in 1956 to amend and reenact R.S.
State v. Guimbellot 95 So. 2d 650 La. 1957
this Court held that beer is a “malt beverage” and is not classified as a “liquor”.
State v. McCarty 94 So. 2d 11 La. 1957
He admits that he was intoxicated but takes the position that his intoxication resulted from the consumption of beer and that, therefore, , , the phrase “intoxicating liquor” as used in LSA-R.S.