DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Flatte v. Nichols, 96 So. 2d 477.

14 citing documents.

  • Hyster Co. v. Reeves 541 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    (1957), and citations therein; Ballard v. McBryde, supra; Theriac v. McKeever, supra.
  • T & J Services, Inc. v. Hall-Buck Marine Service Co. 422 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    1803, 1909, 2439, and 2456; , (1957); (La.App.
  • Theriac v. McKeever 405 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Yorkwood Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Charlie Hardison & Sons, Inc. 383 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    It is true that a judicial exception to the Motor Vehicle Certificate of Title Law may have been created by two cases, , (1957) which are based upon the doctrine of estop-pel.
  • Gomez v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford 314 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
  • Ballard v. McBryde 275 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1957), that the noncompliance with the Vehicle Certificate of Title Law does not affect the validity of a sale of a vehicle otherwise valid under La.C.C.
  • Robinson v. Jackson 255 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
  • Parnell v. Baham 228 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    The conclusion we have reached finds ample support in the jurisprudence of our State and particularly, in addition to the cases cited above, the following: , (1957); Jeffrey Motor Company v. Higgins, 230 La.
  • General Finance Corp. of New Orleans v. Harrell 188 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    H. J. Williams Motor Company v. Zeagler, La.App., ; Sprowl v. Foshee, La.App., ; General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Daigle, 225 La.
  • Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Waters 159 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    Clark-Kelley Livestock Auction Co. v. Pioneer Bank & T. Co., 228 La.
  • Distinguished Trumbull Chevrolet Sales Company v. Maxwell 142 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    cular vehicle was the basis for the transfer of title from the O. K. Motor Company of Dresden, Tennessee, to the Reed Motor Company of Monroe, which subsequently sold and delivered the vehicle to defendant, Maxwell, who executed a chattel mortgage thereon in favor of defendant, United Credit Plan, , , in support of their opposed contentions.
  • Gooch v. Dick Bohn Ford, Inc. 140 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    H. G. Williams Motor Company v. Zeagler, La.App., ; Sprowl v. Foshee, La.App., ; General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Daigle, 225 La.
  • James v. Judice 140 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
  • Westbrook v. Blakewell 126 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    where, on pages 479 and 480, we find our Supreme Court saying: “It is argued by the plaintiff-appellant that the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Title Certificate Law, LSA-R.S.