DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite California Company v. Price, 99 So. 2d 743.

40 citing documents.

  • State v. Smith 571 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    13:4231; , (1957); (La.App.
  • Guidry v. BAYLY, MARTIN & FAY OF LA., INC. 545 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Lowe v. Rivers 445 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Wilson v. HJ Wilson Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    In Shell Oil Company, supra
  • Lamb v. Lamb 408 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Holley v. Royal Globe Ins. Co. 407 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Co., , which had entrenched the doctrine of judicial estoppel in our jurisprudence.
  • Ugulano v. Allstate Ins. Co. 367 So. 2d 6 La. 1978
    where we examined in detail the "judicial estoppel" , (1957), judicial confession and the common law doctrine of "collateral estoppel."
  • Ugulano v. Allstate Insurance 359 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1978
    4th Cir. 1976), we observed: “The thrust of the California Co. [ , (1957)] decision, considered with earlier and later decisions on the subject, is that when the triple identities are present, C.C.
  • Sutterfield v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. 344 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
  • Scurlock Oil Co. v. Getty Oil Co. 344 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    (1957): “It is the settled jurisprudence of this court that matters once determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, if the judgment has become final, can never again be called into question by the parties or their privies, though the judgment may have been erroneous and liable to certain reversal
  • Mitchell v. Bertolla 340 So. 2d 287 La. 1976
    (1957), "adopted common law estoppel as one of the bases for its decision .
  • Brown v. Globe Tool & Engineering Co. 337 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    460 (La.1937); , (1957).
  • Morris v. Morris 336 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Civil Code Article 2286; , (1957).
  • Honeycutt v. Town of Boyce 327 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    The doctrine of judicial estoppel or estoppel by judgment has been recognized in Louisiana, , (1957), although there is language to the contrary: ".
  • Sliman v. McBee 311 So. 2d 248 La. 1975
    Alternatively, defendants urge that principles of judicial estoppel bar further litigation of Mrs. Sliman's right of dissolution, citing, inter alia, , (1957).
  • Baker v. Wheless Drilling Company 303 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    (1957) the court held, "[E]ven if res judicata cannot be strictly applied the parties to this litigation are bound by judicial estoppel which *515 extends to every material allegation or statement made on one side in the prior Price case and denied on the other which was determined in the course of the
  • Gros v. LeBlanc 304 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Art. 2286 [2] strictly as written, Judge Domengeaux, in writing for the Court observed: "The same is not true, however, of judicial estoppel, , , our Supreme Court held that the doctrine of judicial estoppel is recognized *51 in Louisiana, and used the following language in explaining its force and scope: "It is the settled jurisprudence of this court that matters once determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, if the judgment has become
  • Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company 294 So. 2d 810 La. 1974
    1121 , (1965); , (1957); 1 Pothier On Obligations (3d ed. 1853, Translation by William David Evans) Article V [53], p. 588.
  • Olsen Engineering Corp. v. Hudson Engineering Corp. 289 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    234 , (1946); , (1957); Bank of Terrebonne & Trust Company v. Marcel, supra; (2nd La.App.1958); Richards v. Crescent Towing & Salvage Co., (Orl.La.App.1959); Lege v. United States F. & G. Co., (3rd La.App.1966); (1st
  • Barnett v. Develle 289 So. 2d 129 La. 1974
    713 , ; Cauefield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y., 5 Cir., 378 F.2d 876 ; Breeland v. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven, Conn., 5 Cir., 421 F.2d 918 ; , ; Quarles v. Lewis, 226 La.
  • Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company 278 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    (1957), the Louisiana Supreme Court held: "It is the settled jurisprudence of this court that matters once determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, if the judgment has become final, can never again be called into question by the parties or their privies, though the judgment may have been erroneo
  • Bordelon v. Landry 278 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    where the court granted writs in a concursus proceeding to determine the validity of a mineral lease.
  • Broussard v. Broussard 275 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    The same is not true, however, of judicial estoppel, , , our Supreme Court held that the doctrine of judicial estoppel is recognized in Louisiana, and used the following language in explaining its force and scope: It is the settled jurisprudence of this court that matters once determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, if the judgment has become final
  • Rayborn v. Rayborn 246 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1957) and cases therein cited.
  • Placid Oil Co. v. Young 246 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Succession of Marlin 240 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    e existence of the alleged act of adoption by Isaac Urban and Eva Mae of Urban, Jr. It seems clear that Billy Wayne is the “successor” of Urban, Jr., the “ayant cause" of Urban, Jr., or the “privy” of Urban, Jr. Since we sustain the exception of res judicata, it is unnecessary to discuss appellant’s contention that the doctrine of “judicial estoppel,” , (1957), is applicable.
  • Stevens v. State Mineral Board 233 So. 2d 542 La. 1970
  • Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company 209 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    2d 197 ; , ; Pitts v. Neugent, 187 La.
  • FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NY v. Clemmons 198 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    : "It is the settled jurisprudence of this court that matters once determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, if the judgment has become final, can never again be called into question by the parties or their privies, though the judgment may have been erroneous and liable to certain reversal o
  • Lege v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 186 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    (1957) as follows: "Moreover, even if res judicata cannot be strictly applied the parties to this litigation are bound by judicial estoppel which extends to every material allegation or statement made on one side in the prior Price case and denied on the other which was determined in the course of the p
  • Coates Equipment & Service, Inc. v. Glover 181 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Shell Oil Company v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 176 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    It does contend that this case is governed by the federal rule of collateral estoppel under the full faith and credit statute and further contends that Louisiana law also recognizes the doctrine of *696 , .
  • Giroir v. Dumesnil 172 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Allen v. Commercial National Bank in Shreveport, La.App., .
  • Rouseo v. Atlas Finance Co. 167 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    965 : “ ‘The doctrine of the common law courts that res adjudicata includes not only everything pleaded in a cause but even that which might have been pleaded, does not generally obtain under our system.’ ” (Citing many authorities) , , sometimes referred to as the second Price case, the majority opinion stated: “Moreover, even if res judicata cannot be strictly applied the parties to this litigation are bound by judicial estoppel which extends to every material allegation or statement made on o
  • Johnson v. Lemons 157 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. State Mineral Board, 203 La.
  • Allen v. Commercial National Bank in Shreveport 138 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    805 ; , ; Pitts v. Neugent, 187 La.
  • Terrebonne Parish School Board v. St. Mary Parish School Board 138 So. 2d 104 La. 1961
  • State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 928 La. 1961
    Of the three justices who have not subscribed to the court's action in refusing the instant writ, only Mr. Justice HAWTHORNE was a member of this court at the time the first Price case and its sequel, the second Price case ( , ), were handed down.
  • Buhler v. Villec 117 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    [7] Quarles v. Lewis, supra, the rationale of which was not overruled by California Company v. Price, 1957, , , according to the author of that opinion.
  • Richards v. Crescent Towing & Salvage Co. 115 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1959
    252 , ; California Company v. Price, 1957, , .