Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance, 89 So. 2d 113.
- Talley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana 760 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
-
Marks v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.
531 So. 2d 516
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
1 (1975); Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, 207 La.
- Massengill v. Aetna Life Insurance 405 So. 2d 516 La. 1981
-
Paret v. Louisiana Health Ser. & Indem.
366 So. 2d 634
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
E. g., Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , (1956); (La.App.
-
Ada Resources v. Don Chamblin & Associates
361 So. 2d 1339
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Co., , (1956), 55 A.L.R.
-
Templet v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
341 So. 2d 1248
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Co., , (1956), 55 A.L.R.
-
O'Donovan v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company
305 So. 2d 643
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Co., , (1956); Thomas v. Universal Life Ins.
-
Vallot v. ALL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
302 So. 2d 625
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , (1956); (La.App.
-
Reichert v. Continental Insurance Company
290 So. 2d 730
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
758 , ; Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , , both of which authorities deal with an action pursuant to Section 657.
-
Martin v. American Benefit Life Insurance Company
294 So. 2d 200
La. 1974
Co., , (1966); Niles v. American Bankers Ins.
-
Tingle v. Globe Life Insurance Company
290 So. 2d 460
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Relying on Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Co., , , 55 A.L.R.2d 1014 (1956), the court concluded an insurer must file a test case at its own expense to obtain a judicial interpretation of a provision of its policy.
-
Dupre v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
291 So. 2d 824
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
3rd Cir. 1967); Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , (1956); (La.App.
-
Valladares v. Monarch Insurance Company
282 So. 2d 569
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Co., , (1956), obliges their imposition.
-
Rushing v. American Income Insurance Company
274 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
3 Cir. 1967); Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , (1956).
-
Bewley Furniture Co., Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
271 So. 2d 346
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Co., , (1956); and Standard Life Ins.
-
Cooling v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
269 So. 2d 294
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Co., , (1956), 55 A.L.R.
-
Caswell v. Reserve National Insurance Company
272 So. 2d 37
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
In the case of Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , , the Supreme Court reiterated the following language from Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n, 207 La.
-
Songe v. Tennessee Life Insurance Company
260 So. 2d 149
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Co., 1956, , , where the supreme court reinstated penalties even though a majority of the court of appeal had agreed with the insurer's interpretation of a "hernia" exclusion to exclude "diaphragmatic hernia".
-
Albert v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society
255 So. 2d 170
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
3 Cir. 1967); Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , (1956).
-
Vidrine v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance
251 So. 2d 113
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
55 A.L.R.2d 1014 (1956); (La.App.
- West v. Lincoln Income Life Insurance 239 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
-
Niles v. American Bankers Ins. Co.
229 So. 2d 435
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Co., , , *440 55 A.L.R.2d 1014 (1956), our Supreme Court quoted with approval the following statement: "`We admit that the matter presented is res nova but it cannot even be said that Maxey's action was not arbitrary because the question involved has never been decided by the Louisiana Courts for it is settled
-
Conner v. Motors Insurance Corporation
216 So. 2d 555
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Co., , , 55 A.L.R.2d 1014 .
-
Thomas v. Universal Life Insurance Company
201 So. 2d 529
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
In Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, , , 55 A.L.R.2d 1014 (1956) our Supreme Court quoted with approval from Phelps v. Southern National Insurance Company, La.App., (2d Cir. 1955) the following: "Nor do we think defendant should escape liability for the penalty because in the instant case it misinterpreted both the cause of plai
-
Simmons v. American National Insurance Company
199 So. 2d 421
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Co., , , the Supreme Court quoted with approval from the written reasons of the trial judge, which stated: "`We admit that the matter presented is res nova but it cannot even be said that Maxey's action was not arbitrary because the question involved has never been decided by the Louisiana Courts for it is set
-
Fontenot v. Wabash Life Insurance Company
150 So. 2d 10
La. 1963
Co., , , 55 A.L.R.2d 1014 ; Phelps v. Southern National Ins.
-
Thibodeaux v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.
112 So. 2d 423
La. 1959
Co., , , 55 *737 A.L.R.2d 1014.
-
Schonberg v. New York Life Insurance Company
104 So. 2d 171
La. 1958
Co., , , 55 A.L.R.2d 1014 , we held that the language in a health and accident policy should be construed in its plain, ordinary, and popular sense, rather than according to a technical meaning, especially since the companies contract through their agents with ordinary laymen who may not be expected to know th
-
Thomas W. Hooley & Sons v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance
103 So. 2d 449
La. 1958
Co., , , 55 A.L.R.2d 1014 , on finding that non-payment of the policy benefits was arbitrary this Court awarded similar penalties, even though a majority of the Court of Appeal had sustained the insurer’s defense as to the policyholder’s entire claim and dismissed the latter’s suit.
-
Sumrall v. JC Penney Company
101 So. 2d 758
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Co., , , 55 A.L.R.2d 1014we have decided that penalties should not in the present instance be assessed against the codefendant insurer.