Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Torrance v. City of Shreveport, 93 So. 2d 187.

31 citing documents.

Katherine Winzer v. Bienville Parish School Board and Dr. Byron Lyons, In His Official Capacity as Superintendent of … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Honeybee Holdings, LLC v. St. Tammany Parish Zoning Commission and St. Tammany Parish Government La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Christopher Lehman v. Henry Guinn, Kevin D. Millican, Stephen Vanhook,bobby Vasseur, and City of Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
So.2d 187 (1957), the supreme court addressed this court’s ability to correct an arbitrary and capricious act through mandamus.
The Salinger Group v. City-Parish of East Baton Rouge La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Durden v. Durden 165 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Uletom Hewitt v. Lafayette Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
So.2d 187 (1957), the supreme court addressed this court‟s ability to correct an arbitrary and capricious act through mandamus.
Hewitt v. Lafayette Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 139 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(1957), the supreme court addressed this court’s ability to correct an arbitrary and capricious act through mandamus.
Hamp's Construction, L.L.C. v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 52 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(1957) (where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that mandamus will lie to correct the performance (or nonperformance) of an administrative or quasi-judicial act, such as the arbitrary refusal to grant a license).
Poole v. Louisiana Board of Electrolysis Examiners 964 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
(1957) (wherein our Supreme Court expressly clarified that “[w]hile it is the general rule that mandamus may be invoked only to coerce performance of duties that are purely ministerial in nature, it is well settled in this state as well as in other jurisdictions that the writ mail also be employed
Smith v. RUSTON FIRE AND POL. CIV. SER. BD. 939 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
(1957)(where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that mandamus will lie to correct the performance (or nonperformance) of an administrative or quasi-judicial act, such as the arbitrary refusal to grant a license.
Bonvillian v. Department of Ins. 906 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
(1957) (where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that mandamus will lie to correct the performance (or nonperformance) of an administrative or quasi-judicial act, such as the arbitrary refusal to grant a license).
Fire Protection District Six v. City of Baton Rouge Department of Public Works 868 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Giambelluca v. Parish of St. Charles 687 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Landry v. City of Erath 628 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bonaventure v. Pourciau 577 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Favrot v. Jefferson Parish Council 470 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
(1957); Comment, 16 La.L.Rev.
Sylvester v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury 461 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Barney's Family Market, Inc. v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 452 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Miller v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 441 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(1957); Comment, 16 La.L.Rev.
Caddo Parish School Board v. City of Shreveport 254 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Slusser v. Credeur 252 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
State Ex Rel. Hayes v. Louisiana State Board of Barber Examiners 208 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Luneau v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 196 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Deville v. City of Oakdale 180 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Grice v. Mayor of Morgan City 164 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Lambert v. LaBruyere 154 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1963
State Ex Rel. Summit Fidelity and Surety Company v. Police Jury of Rapides Parish 131 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Torrance v. Caddo Parish Police Jury 119 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Torrance v. City of Shreveport, 1957, , , Justice McCaleb, referring to LSA-R.S.
Torrance v. Caddo Parish Police Jury 100 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
La Rocca v. Dupepe 97 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Torrance v. City of Shreveport, 1957, , ; this was a mandamus proceeding which, of course, distinguishes it from the instant case; nevertheless, the language and analogies used in this opinion by the organ of the Court serve to point up the rationale upon which this dissent is predicated.
State ex rel. Torrance v. Caddo Parish Police Jury 93 So. 2d 190 La. 1957
and presents the same issues.