Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Recreation and Park Commission v. Perkins, 93 So. 2d 198.

36 citing documents.

MacK v. Transport Insurance Company 577 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Wetzka v. Big Three Industries, Inc. 409 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
3 Cir. 1970); , (1957); (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Gormley 357 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
3 Cir. 1970); , (1957); (La.App.
State Department of Highways v. Kornman 336 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
State, Department of Highways v. Gordy 322 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
3 Cir. 1970); , (1957); (La.
State v. Placid Oil Company 300 So. 2d 154 La. 1974
State, Dept. of Highways v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc. 292 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
(1957); State, Department of Highways v. Black, supra."
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Beauregard Dev. Co., Inc. 279 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Dixie Electric Membership Corporation v. McDowell 280 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Dixie Electric Membership Corp. v. Watts 268 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
3rd Cir. 1970); , (1957); State, (La.App.
State v. Donner Corporation 236 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
(1957); State, Department of Highways v. Black, supra.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Colomb 225 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Wappler v. Braucht 209 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
State v. Black 207 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Greenwald 188 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Appropriate here is an observation of the Supreme Court in Recreation and Park Commission, , (1957), wherein it was stated: "Fees to be paid experts depend much on the time lost and the extent of their examination of matters on which they express an opinion and it appears that no absolute rule can be fixed as to the amount to be allowed in all cases.
State, Department of Highways v. Babineaux 189 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
see State through Department of Highways v. Salemi, La.App., .
State, Department of Highways v. Moresi 189 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Salemi, La.App.
Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Pipes 188 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Fees based upon charges for preparatory work in addition to appearance and testimony in court have been approved in numerous cases, among which we cite Recreation & , ; State v. Brooks (2nd Cir., 1963, writs refused), ; Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Greenwald (2nd Cir., 1966), supra.
Cox v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 165 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
443 ; Succ’n of Franz, ; , .
Belgarde v. City of Natchitoches 156 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
The trial court awarded this as an additional expert fee for the time used by the expert to prepare to testify in court, , .
Theunissen v. Guidry 151 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
which interpreted LSA-R.S.
Greater Baton Rouge Consol. Sewer Dist. v. Nelson 144 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Mire 140 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Succession of Franz 133 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Succession of Roth 133 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
also see Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Harang 131 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Board of Commissioners v. Seybold 129 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
to wit: “Fees to be paid experts depend much on the time lost and the extent of their examination of matters on which they express an opinion and it appears that no absolute rule can be fixed as to the amount to be allowed in all cases.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co. 117 So. 2d 261 La. 1960
201 , ; , and Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry, 232 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hub Realty Co. 118 So. 2d 364 La. 1960
201 , ; , and Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry, 232 La.
State v. Tolmas 113 So. 2d 288 La. 1959
Orleans Parish School Board v. Paternostro 107 So. 2d 451 La. 1958
314 , , , ; (2) in arriving at a market value by capitalization of income, the rental amounts and the rate of capitalization used by the school board’s realtors were allegedly better based upon comparable property and less a matter of individual opinion than were such figures utilized by the court’s expert in arr
Town of Slaughter v. Appleby 103 So. 2d 461 La. 1958
According to the language of.LRS 13:3666 , these witnesses are entitled to expert fees, to be taxed as costs, for their services in the case.
Coine v. Smith 100 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Recreation and Park Commission, , ; Succession of Moody, 229 La.
Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 95 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
See Recreation and Park Commission, , .
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry 94 So. 2d 9 La. 1957
657 , ; and Recreation and Park Commission of East Baton Rouge Parish v. Perkins, La., .
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry 94 So. 2d 9 La. 1957
657 , ; and Recreation and Park Commission of East Baton Rouge Parish v. Perkins, La., .