Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spiers v. Davidson, 96 So. 2d 502.

29 citing documents.

Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
the Supreme Court stated, “a simulated contract is one which has no substance at all, or is purely fictitious and a sham, an act of mere pretense without reality.
Scoggins v. Frederick 744 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. 616 So. 2d 1234 La. 1993
Harwood Oil & Mining Co. v. Black, 240 La.
Arsht v. Davis 550 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2 Cir.1974); , appeal after remand, (La.App.
Cassagne v. Justice 472 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1978); , 233 La.
Auger v. Auger 381 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Thompson v. Thompson 371 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
A simulated sale has been said to be “one which has no substance at all, or is purely fictitious and a sham, an act of mere pretense without reality.” , (1957).
Russell v. Culpepper 344 So. 2d 1372 La. 1977
Williams v. Smith 340 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Adams v. Trichel 304 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Williamson Marine Transport, Inc. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 293 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Elliott v. Dupuy, 242 La.
Finkel v. Texas-Edwards, Inc. 267 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Distinguished Parker v. Rhodes 260 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
Chapin v. Chapin 234 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1957); Ane v. Ane, 225 La.
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England 215 So. 2d 640 La. 1968
Spiers v. Da *642 vidson, , (1957); Ane v. Ane, 225 La.
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England 215 So. 2d 640 La. 1968
(1957); Ane v. Ane, 225 La.
Loeb v. Badalamenti 192 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
173 , ; , ; Ducote v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., La.App., .
Succession of Delesdernier 184 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
" , : * * * [A] simulated contract is one which has no substance at all, or is purely fictitious and a sham, an act of mere pretense without reality.
Quinette v. Delhommer 176 So. 2d 399 La. 1965
Ducote v. City of New Orleans 176 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
173 , ; , ; Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, La.
Quinette v. Delhommer 176 So. 2d 399 La. 1965
Successions of Webre 172 So. 2d 285 La. 1965
: "* * * [A] simulated contract is one which has no substance at all, or is purely fictitious and a sham, an act of mere pretense without reality.
Successions of Webre 172 So. 2d 285 La. 1965
: “ * * * [A] simulated contract is one which has no substance at all, or is purely fictitious and a sham, an act of mere pretense without reality.
Kinney v. Kinney 150 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Thus, , , the Supreme Court held that "a simulated contract is one which has no substance at all, or is purely fictitious and a sham, an act of mere pretense without reality.
Spiers v. Davidson 135 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
[As amended, Acts 1884, No. 5]” In its opinion upon remand, , , (1957), the Supreme Court commented: “ * * * a simulated contract is one which has no^ substance at all, or is purely fictitious and a sham, an act of mere pretense without reality.
Elliott v. Dupuy 135 So. 2d 54 La. 1961
New Orleans Opera Guild, Inc. v. Local 174, Musicians Mutual Protective Union 134 So. 2d 901 La. 1961
and cases therein cited.
Keller v. Thompson 121 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Bagala v. Bagala 110 So. 2d 526 La. 1959
870 , , and authorities there cited; , .