DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Kamlade, 94 So. 2d 257.

14 citing documents.

  • Succession Of Dean Allen Bradley La. 2022
    This argument would require us to ignore the fundamental rule that “[t] o determine the inte ntion of the testator the whole will is to be taken into consideration.” (1957).
  • Succession of Mydland 653 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Instead, that predeceasing leaves as the residuary clause, "I request that the remainder [go] to" the second-named persons, effectively ripening the request into a legacy to those second-named persons (much as the death of the first legatee under a prohibited substitution converts the substitution into a valid legacy to the second legatee; , (1957)).
  • Succession of Jones 377 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    511 , ; , ; and Thompson on Wills, Section 215, at page 333.
  • Succession of Burgess 359 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    App.4th Cir. 1972) to the effect that, 1) Louisiana courts construe wills in a sense which gives them effect rather than renders them invalid, and they prefer an interpretation of which will save the decedent from intestacy, , (1957), Succession of Mulqueeny, 248 La.
  • Succession of Franz 329 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    15 (1934) ; , (1957) ; Carr v. Bart, 220 La.
  • Succession of Killingsworth 292 So. 2d 536 La. 1974
    112 , (1947); , (1957); Succession of Barry, 250 La.
  • Distinguished Succession of Martin 262 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    concerned a will providing that one-half of decedent's estate would go to the "cousins" on his mother's side, and the other half to the "cousins" on his father's side.
  • Succession of Dinwiddie 263 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    (1957); Succession of Mulqueeny, 248 La.
  • Succession of Barnett 245 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    In this case, the objectionable clause contained the language “ * * * I wish * * * ” The testator in , (1957), left one-half of his estate to his “cousins” on his mother’s side of the family, and the remaining one-half to his “cousins” from his father’s side of the family.
  • Champ Auto Sales, Inc. v. Savoy 207 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    of Kamlade, , (1957); Fenerty v. Culotta, 228 La.
  • Succession of Barry 196 So. 2d 265 La. 1967
    511 , ; , ; and Thompson on Wills, Section 215, at page 333.
  • Giroir v. Dumesnil 172 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Placid Oil Company v. AM Dupont Corporation 156 So. 2d 444 La. 1963
    Fenerty v. Culotta, 228 La.
  • Succession of Elliott 111 So. 2d 344 La. 1959