DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Franz, 94 So. 2d 270.

22 citing documents.

  • State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    556 , (1957); , (1957); Succession of Jahraus, supra; (La.App.
  • Succession of Reeves 704 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Petty v. Petty 560 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    556 , (1957); , (1957); Succession of Jahraus, supra ; (La.App.
  • Succession of Landry 545 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Succession of Cahn 522 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Succession of Hamiter 519 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    The supreme court again expressed this same view in , (1957).
  • Succession of Bacot 502 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    3rd Cir.1966); , (1957).
  • Succession of Lamy 454 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    “Those who afterwards marry are excepted from this rule.” The Louisiana Supreme Court in the case of , stated the test for open concubinage as follows: “In LSA-Civil Code, article 1481, the word ‘concubinage’ describes a status and not mere acts of fornication or adultery however frequent or even habitual, it imports the maintenance of a status resembling marriage and the word ‘open’ means fre
  • Gray v. Gray 451 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    556 , (1957); , (1957); Succession of Jahraus, supra ; (La.App.
  • Thomas v. Thomas 440 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    556 , (1957); , (1957); Succession of Jahraus, supra ; (La.App.
  • Cook v. Cook 436 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    See, e.g.; , (1957) ; Succession of Jahraus, 114 La.
  • Castle v. Prudhomme Tank Truck Line, Inc. 417 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    See e.g.; , (1957); Succession of Jahraus, 114 La.
  • Henderson v. Travelers Ins. Co. 354 So. 2d 1031 La. 1978
    See, e. g.; , (1957); Succession of Jahraus, 114 La.
  • Guidry v. Hardy 254 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    App. 2 Cir. 1963); , (1957); Cormier v. Myers, supra.
  • Woods v. Society for Propagation of Faith of Archdiocese of New Orleans, Inc. 251 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1957) and authorities cited therein.
  • Succession of Vegas 236 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Also, in , , (1957) the court said: “In determining the validity of a will the trial Judge’s findings of fact are entitled to great weight and should not be disturbed unless they are clearly or manifestly erroneous.” (Authorities omitted.
  • Succession of Andrews 153 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
  • Succession of Franz 139 So. 2d 216 La. 1962
  • Succession of Franz 133 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    33 , , , , and Succession of Franz, 236 La.
  • Succession of Bradford 130 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Succession of Lafferanderie, 228 La.
  • Succession of Herson 127 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Texada v. Spence, 166 La.
  • Succession of Roth 109 So. 2d 92 La. 1959
    See, , , where this court affirmed the judgment of the district court dismissing defendants’ opposition to the probate of the will at their cost.