Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, 90 So. 2d 78.

18 citing documents.

Moretco, Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish Council 112 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
A zoning ordinance “is invalid where it leaves its ^interpretation, administration or enforcement to the unbridled discretion, caprice or arbitrary action of the municipal legislative body or administrative bodies or officials.” McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956).
Roudakis v. City of Ruston 927 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Plaintiffs cited a number of cases to support their contention that the variances were granted in error: Tiber Petroleum, McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956).
City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs 640 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
303 (1926); (On rehearing); McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956); State ex rel Dema Realty Co. v. McDonald 168 La.
Morton v. Jefferson Parish Council 419 So. 2d 431 La. 1982
1082 , (1959); McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956).
Baehr v. City of Lake Charles 387 So. 2d 1160 La. 1980
McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956); Vieux Carre Property Owners and Associates, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 246 La.
Cook v. Metropolitan Shreveport Bd. of App. 339 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956) and Bultman Mortuary Service, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 174 La.
Paternostro v. Parish of Jefferson 289 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
1082 , , and McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , 90 So.
Summerell v. Phillips 282 So. 2d 450 La. 1973
2d 720 (1959); McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956); State ex rel.
City of Natchitoches v. State 221 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
451 , ; McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , .
Fondren v. Morgan City 220 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
In the cases of McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956), and Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., 237 La.
Vieux Carre Property Owners & Associates, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 167 So. 2d 367 La. 1964
McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , (1956).
Southern Land Title Corp. v. City of New Orleans 156 So. 2d 229 La. 1963
McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , ; Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., 237 La.
Sears, Roebuck & Company v. City of Alexandria 155 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Defendant cites McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , and Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc., 237 La.
Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, Inc. 112 So. 2d 720 La. 1959
Banjavich v. Louisiana Licensing Board for Marine Divers 111 So. 2d 505 La. 1959
994 , and our recent decisions in McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , 90 So.
State v. Rue 107 So. 2d 702 La. 1958
341 , ; cf., McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , .
Shannon v. Morgan City Harbor & Terminal District 102 So. 2d 446 La. 1958
While it is true that standards are required in legislation to guard against arbitrary and capricious action by a governing authority under penalty of unconstitutionality (McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , ; and the authorities therein cited), the provision cannot have the effect of invalidating this bond issue as it has no bearing on the procedure to be followed leading up to the issuance of the bonds.
Ezell v. City-Parish Plumbing Board of Baton Rouge 100 So. 2d 464 La. 1958
A zoning ordinance cannot leave the exercise of property rights to the caprice, whim or esthetic sense of a special group of individuals * * ” McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, , .