Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fizer, 986 So. 2d 243.
- La. 2020
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Fulford
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
App. 2 Cir. 6/4/08), State v. Martin, 43,243 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Lander Zackery La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- State v. Kennon 273 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Woods
248 So. 3d 610
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 2 Cir. 6/4/08), ; State v. Bailey , 40,098 (La.
-
State v. Thomas
223 So. 3d 125
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
2 Cir. 6/4/08), , this court determined that the district court's advisement of time limitations for appeal after the imposition of the sentence did not influence the defendant's guilty plea and, therefore, precluded the defendant from seeking review of the sentence.
- State v. Shelton 207 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
-
State v. Allen
194 So. 3d 649
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
In State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), , State v. Martin, 43,243 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), , and State v. Wright, supra, we found that the defendant was not entitled to an appeal of a sentence as excessive where a guilty plea was entered with a sentencing cap and the defendant was not told that he or she had appellate rights until after the se
-
State v. Hebert
181 So. 3d 795
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Lewis, 49,138 (La.App.2d Cir.6/25/14), ; State v. Smith, 47,800 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/13), ; State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Foster, 42,212 (La.App.2d Cir.8/15/07), .
-
Criticized
State v. Paulson
177 So. 3d 360
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2 Cir. 6/4/08), , declined to follow its decision in Foster because the trial judge only mentioned the right to appeal the sentence during sentencing and not during the plea colloquy; the court therefore found no risk of an involuntary plea.
-
State v. Brown
181 So. 3d 170
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), .
-
State v. Smith
145 So. 3d 1097
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.06/04/08), .
-
State v. Banks
136 So. 3d 937
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
See State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Pullig, 44,606 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), .
-
State v. Smith
110 So. 3d 628
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Subsequently, in State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), , this court held that the sentence imposed within the agreed cap was not reviewable, even though at sentencing the court had informed Fizer of the time limitations for appeal.
-
State of Louisiana v. Larry Nix
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See, State v. Scott, 44,509 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/09), State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), State v. Foster, supra.
-
State v. Gabriel
78 So. 3d 803
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 6/04/08), , we considered whether a defendant could seek review of *805 his sentence, made within an agreed-upon sentencing cap, when the trial court informed the defendant of the time limitations within which to appeal his sentence | ¡¡immediately after sentencing.
-
State v. Halley
70 So. 3d 1102
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Scott, 44,509 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/09), ; State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), .
-
State v. Vance
36 So. 3d 1152
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See, State v. Scott, 44,509 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/09), ; State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Foster, supra.
-
State v. Hicks
30 So. 3d 1081
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Bailey, 40,098 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), , writ denied, 2006-0462 (La.9/22/06), .
-
State v. PULLIG
22 So. 3d 1043
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.06/04/08), , this court addressed the issue of whether a defendant could seek review of his sentence, made within an agreed-upon sentencing cap, when the trial court informed the defendant of the time limitations within which to appeal his sentence immediately after sentencing.
-
State v. Scott
17 So. 3d 1058
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Bailey, 40,098 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), , writ denied, 2006-0462 (La.9/22/06), ; State v. Smith, 39,719 (La.App.2d Cir.5/11/05), .
-
State v. Taylor
12 So. 3d 482
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.06/04/08), ; State v. Martin, 43,243 (La.App.2d Cir.06/04/08), .