Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fizer, 986 So. 2d 243.

22 citing documents.

  • La. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Fulford La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
    App. 2 Cir. 6/4/08), State v. Martin, 43,243 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lander Zackery La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Kennon 273 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Woods 248 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    App. 2 Cir. 6/4/08), ; State v. Bailey , 40,098 (La.
  • State v. Thomas 223 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    2 Cir. 6/4/08), , this court determined that the district court's advisement of time limitations for appeal after the imposition of the sentence did not influence the defendant's guilty plea and, therefore, precluded the defendant from seeking review of the sentence.
  • State v. Shelton 207 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Allen 194 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    In State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), , State v. Martin, 43,243 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), , and State v. Wright, supra, we found that the defendant was not entitled to an appeal of a sentence as excessive where a guilty plea was entered with a sentencing cap and the defendant was not told that he or she had appellate rights until after the se
  • State v. Hebert 181 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Lewis, 49,138 (La.App.2d Cir.6/25/14), ; State v. Smith, 47,800 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/13), ; State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Foster, 42,212 (La.App.2d Cir.8/15/07), .
  • Criticized State v. Paulson 177 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    2 Cir. 6/4/08), , declined to follow its decision in Foster because the trial judge only mentioned the right to appeal the sentence during sentencing and not during the plea colloquy; the court therefore found no risk of an involuntary plea.
  • State v. Brown 181 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), .
  • State v. Smith 145 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.06/04/08), .
  • State v. Banks 136 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Pullig, 44,606 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), .
  • State v. Smith 110 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Subsequently, in State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), , this court held that the sentence imposed within the agreed cap was not reviewable, even though at sentencing the court had informed Fizer of the time limitations for appeal.
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Nix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    See, State v. Scott, 44,509 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/09), State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), State v. Foster, supra.
  • State v. Gabriel 78 So. 3d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    2 Cir. 6/04/08), , we considered whether a defendant could seek review of *805 his sentence, made within an agreed-upon sentencing cap, when the trial court informed the defendant of the time limitations within which to appeal his sentence | ¡¡immediately after sentencing.
  • State v. Halley 70 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Scott, 44,509 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/09), ; State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), .
  • State v. Vance 36 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    See, State v. Scott, 44,509 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/09), ; State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Foster, supra.
  • State v. Hicks 30 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Bailey, 40,098 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), , writ denied, 2006-0462 (La.9/22/06), .
  • State v. PULLIG 22 So. 3d 1043 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    2d Cir.06/04/08), , this court addressed the issue of whether a defendant could seek review of his sentence, made within an agreed-upon sentencing cap, when the trial court informed the defendant of the time limitations within which to appeal his sentence immediately after sentencing.
  • State v. Scott 17 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), ; State v. Bailey, 40,098 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), , writ denied, 2006-0462 (La.9/22/06), ; State v. Smith, 39,719 (La.App.2d Cir.5/11/05), .
  • State v. Taylor 12 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Fizer, 43,271 (La.App.2d Cir.06/04/08), ; State v. Martin, 43,243 (La.App.2d Cir.06/04/08), .