Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Blankenship, 93 So. 2d 533.
- State v. Defraites 449 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-
State v. Gaines
347 So. 2d 1153
La. 1977
961 , (1962); , (1957); State v. Dalcour, 145 La.
- State v. Hungerford 278 So. 2d 33 La. 1973
-
State v. Richmond
278 So. 2d 17
La. 1973
(1957); State v. Dwyer, 133 La.
-
State v. Williams
263 So. 2d 306
La. 1972
In State vs. Blankenship, , 93 So.
- State v. McClanahan 262 So. 2d 499 La. 1972
-
State v. Isaac
260 So. 2d 302
La. 1972
(1957); State v. Dwyer, 133 La.
- State v. Morales 240 So. 2d 714 La. 1970
-
State v. Andrus
199 So. 2d 867
La. 1967
More recently, , , this court said: “ * * * in cases of theft proof of ownership of the property stolen in the particular person alleged is unimportant, the state being required to show only that it belonged to someone other than the accused.” To the same effect is State v. Babineaux, 146 La.
-
State v. Christiana
186 So. 2d 580
La. 1966
15:226.” See also Blankenship, , and State v. Richard, 245 La.
-
State v. Gurney
185 So. 2d 19
La. 1966
Although changing the date alone may not, under all circumstances, create the prejudice contemplated by Article 364 and be grounds for a new trial ( , (1947) and State v. Johnson, 228 La.
-
State v. Simpson
175 So. 2d 255
La. 1965
and State v. Eyer, 237 La.
-
State v. Simpson
175 So. 2d 255
La. 1965
and State v. Eyer, 237 La.
-
State v. Pailet
165 So. 2d 294
La. 1964
223 , ; , and State v. Allen, 243 La.
- State v. Richard 158 So. 2d 828 La. 1963
- State v. Allen 146 So. 2d 407 La. 1962
- State v. Leierer 140 So. 2d 375 La. 1962
- State v. Augustine 131 So. 2d 56 La. 1961
- State v. Wilson 127 So. 2d 158 La. 1961
- State v. Eyer 110 So. 2d 521 La. 1959