Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kendrick v. Mason, 99 So. 2d 108.

65 citing documents.

Williams v. Wood 258 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
522 , (1957) ; Kendrick v. Mason , , 276, , 110 (1958) ; and Truxillo v. Gentilly Med.
Rando v. Top Notch Properties, LLC 879 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
(1958) case, there are allegations in our present case that defective workmanship and defective materials caused continuous exposure to rain at the school, which caused the roof to leak.
Tower Credit, Inc. v. Carpenter 825 So. 2d 1125 La. 2002
(in which garnishment of a sum owed an independent contractor was upheld).
Tower Credit, Inc. v. Carpenter 809 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
(in which garnishment of a sum owed an independent contractor was upheld).
Iberia Parish School Bd. v. Sandifer & Son Construction Co., Inc. 721 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
(1958), a case in which a sewer system installer failed to repair and reconstruct gas lines severed in the performance of his contract with the Town of Jena to install a sewerage collection system.
La. Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London 616 So. 2d 1250 La. 1993
art. 2056; , (1958); Snell v. Stein, 261 La.
Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n v. Hunt 551 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Clement v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 528 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
522 , (1958); , (1958); Cell-O-Mar, (La.App.
Creech v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 516 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
As stated in Insurance Company of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc., "It is settled jurisprudence that policy language is to be read broadly in favor of coverage, , (1958); (La.App.
Poirrier v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. 501 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
(1958), rehearing denied February 10, 1958.
Hall v. Rapides Parish School Board 491 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The plaintiffs contend that the following cases are applicable and that the trial court should be reversed: , (1958); Marine Insurance Company v. Strecker, 234 La.
Oller v. Sharp Elec., Inc. 451 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Instead, , (1958) as authority for a reversal of the trial court's judgment under the circumstances of this case.
Pickels v. Brown 431 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Primm v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 426 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
1st Cir.1972); , (1958).
Bacon v. Diamond Motors, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
To the same effect see Kendrick v. Mason, [ ] [(La.1958)]; Poynter v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, [(La.App.
Lombard v. Manchester Life Ins. Co. 406 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Little v. Kalo Laboratories, Inc. 406 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
1st Cir. 1972); , (1958).
Adkins v. La Terre Development Corp. 387 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Defendant-appellant, Sign, , (1958).
Graham v. Equity Nat. Life Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Co., supra; , Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
Insurance Co. of North America v. Solari Parking 370 So. 2d 503 La. 1979
It is settled jurisprudence that policy language is to be read broadly in favor of coverage, , (1958); and that ambiguities are to be construed against the insurer.
General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Cherokee Insurance 368 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
art. 1957; , (1958); (La.App.
American Auto. Ass'n, Inc. v. Globe Indem. Co. 362 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Ada Resources v. Don Chamblin & Associates 361 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
"Inasmuch as the insurer has the duty to express clearly his obligation, Kendrick [ , ], supra, and also because ambiguities are to be construed against the insurer, Albritton [ Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
Ory v. Louisiana & Southern Life Ins. Co. 352 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
[4] , ; Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
Templet v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. 341 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
"Inasmuch as the insurer has the duty to express clearly his obligation, Kendrick, supra, [ , (1958)], and also because ambiguities are to be construed against the insurer, Albritton, supra [ Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
Spain v. Travelers Indemnity Company 321 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Home Insurance Co. v. Doe 321 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
In his reasons for judgment for his first opinion, , (1958) and its progeny, the “completed operations” exclusion in the policy was ambiguous and therefore must be construed against the insurer.
Bubrig v. Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Company 306 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Jones v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 299 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
424 , , 1965) ; , (1958).
Oceanonics, Inc. v. Petroleum Distributing Company 292 So. 2d 190 La. 1974
The writ was granted primarily to determine: (1) whether the third-party defendant insurance company, Market, had avoided, by contractual change, , (1958) and the appellate court decisions which followed that holding; and (2) whether the exclusion of coverage for damage, accidentally occurring after the policy expiration but resulting from a delictual act committed during the policy period, was contrary to public policy.
Mut v. Newark Insurance Company 289 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Taylor Contracting & Supply Company v. American Mutual Liability Ins.
Insurance Co. of No. Amer. v. Binnings Const. Co., Inc. 288 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
art. 1957 and Kendrick v. Mason, 1958, , .
Oceanonics, Inc. v. Petroleum Distributing Company 280 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
(1958); Taylor Contracting & Supply Company v. American Mutual Liability Ins.
Johnson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. 274 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Cooling v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 269 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Corkern v. MAIN INSURANCE COMPANY, CHICAGO, ILL. 268 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Lambert v. B & R Construction Co. 266 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Villere v. Mook 266 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1958), wherein the Supreme Court discussed at length a similarly worded exclusion in a suit against a negligent contractor and his insured.
Lamastus & Associates, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance Co. 260 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Fuselier v. Louisiana Hospital Service, Inc. 260 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Lumber Products, Inc. v. Hiriart 255 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
[7] , ; Truxillo v. Gentilly Medical Building, Inc., La.App., .
Graham v. Maryland Casualty Company 230 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Wilks v. Allstate Insurance Company, supra, , .
JM Brown Const. Co. v. D & M Mechanical Contr., Inc. 222 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
cited by appellants, inapplicable to the case at hand.
Simmons v. American National Insurance Company 199 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Wilks v. Allstate Insurance Company, (La.App., 3 Cir., 1967), .
American Insurance Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 198 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
However, in the Thibodeaux case, , ; King v. Mason, La.App., ; and, Swillie v. General Motors Corp., et al., La.
Wilks v. Allstate Insurance Company 195 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Wilks v. Allstate, cited above.
Anderson v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 191 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
App., (2nd Cir. 1957); , (1958); Velotta v. Western Fire Insurance Company, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1960).
Pappas v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 191 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
522 , (1954); King v. Mason, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1957); , (1958); Velotta v. Western Fire Insurance Company, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1960).
Tillery v. Pelican Ice & Cold Storage, Inc. 184 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Plaintiffs cite the following cases in support of their contention: , ; King v. Mason, 234 La.
Vobill Homes, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. 179 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
In contending to the contrary, , ; Poynter v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, La.App.