DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Delatte v. Woods, 94 So. 2d 281.

18 citing documents.

  • Gilmer v. Principle Energy 256 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    In Delatte v. Woods , , (1957), the court stated that the completion and the existence of a shut-in gas well on a validly created unit are equivalent to production on all tracts in order to interrupt the prescription accruing against a royalty interest and to preserve the same from extinction by prescription.
  • Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 144 So. 3d 791 La. 2013
  • Goodrich v. Exxon Co., USA 608 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co. 488 So. 2d 955 La. 1986
    (1957), relied on the established rule that "the drilling and production of oil from a unitized area constitutes an exercise and use of the mineral rights throughout the entire unit and operates as a substitute for performance of drilling obligations contained in a mineral lease covering any proper
  • Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co. 477 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Mathews v. Goodrich Oil Co. 471 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Rebstock v. Birthright Oil & Gas Co. 406 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    (1957), a case originating in this jurisdiction, the Supreme Court of Louisiana made the following observations at page 287 of the Southern Reporter: Plaintiffs do not contest the right of the State to regulate and control, or to prohibit the production of minerals; and in the light of the foregoing pri
  • Auzenne v. Lawrence Oil Co. 179 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    48 , ; , ; LeBlanc v. Haynesville Mercantile Co., 230 La.
  • LeSage v. Union Producing Co. 176 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Caldwell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. 155 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    (1957) based on a factual situation similar to the one here under consideration, it was held: “It is firmly established in our jurisprudence that statutory authority is granted to the Commissioner of Conservation to create drilling developmental units and to integrate various tracts of various owners co
  • Kimbrough v. Atlantic Refining Co. 152 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Hunter Company v. Shell Oil Company, 211 La.
  • Landry v. Flaitz 148 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    though in fact the evidence shows in that case there was under consideration the existence of a shut-in gas well rather than a producing or drilling well, we are of the firm opinion the observations therein are particularly applicable to the resolution of the issues herein involved.
  • Odom v. Union Producing Company 141 So. 2d 649 La. 1962
    2 , , plaintiffs conceded that the lease, insofar as it affected the SWJ4 of SWi4'.of Section 33, was preserved by the operation on this unit.
  • Odom v. Union Producing Company 129 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    LeBlanc v. Haynesville Mercantile Company, Inc., 230 La.
  • Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Jones 125 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    370 , ; , , and Everett et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 218 La.
  • Schnitt v. Woods 125 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    is particularly appropriate: “The rule is too well established itt our jurisprudence to require citation that the drilling and production of oil from a unitized area constitutes an exercise and user of the mineral rights throughout the entire unit and operates as a substitute for performance of d
  • Monsanto Chemical Co. v. Southern Natural Gas Co. 102 So. 2d 223 La. 1958
  • Richard v. Sohio Petroleum Co. 101 So. 2d 676 La. 1958