Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Madison v. Bolton, 102 So. 2d 433.

69 citing documents.

Calvin W. Braxton, Sr. v. Louisiana State Troopers Association La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
So.2d 433, 439 n. 7 (1958).
Terry Johnson v. Cabot Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
So.2d 5 433, 439 n. 7 (1958).
Jane Doe v. Herbert Lewis, Junior La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
So.2d 433, 439 n. 7 (1958).
Lambert v. Delcarpio 272 So. 3d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Madison v. Bolton , , , 439 n. 7 (1958).
Nolan v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 90 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Kennedy, supra ( , , 439 n. 7 (1958)).
Cook v. American Gateway Bank 49 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Id., 05-1418 at p. 17, 93S So.2d at 682, , 1013 n. 7, , 439 n. 7 (La.1958).
Jalou II, Inc. v. Liner 43 So. 3d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Id., , , 439 n. 7 (La.1958).
Mitchell v. Villien 19 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 4/8/09), 7 So.3d at 885 , citing Costello, 03-1146, p. 13 (La.1/21/04), , supra; , (1958).
Roux v. Pflueger 16 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Kennedy v. Sheriff of East Baton Rouge 935 So. 2d 669 La. 2006
Costello , 03-1146 at 13, 864 So.2d at 140
Wright v. Bennett 924 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In support of this proposition, , (1958) (La.App.
Costello v. Hardy 864 So. 2d 129 La. 2004
Nevertheless, this court has recognized the distinction, , (1958); Cangelosi, 390 So.2d at 198 , and we choose not to depart from that precedent here.
Anders v. Andrus 773 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Aranyosi v. Delchamps, Inc. 739 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Elmer, 485 So.2d at 176 , , (1958).
Zellinger v. Amalgamated Clothing 683 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
2d Cir.1975) ( , (1958)).
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
2d Cir.1975) ( , (1958)).
Fourcade v. City of Gretna 598 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Usner v. Strobach 591 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Melancon v. Hyatt Corp. 589 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Martin v. Lincoln General Hosp. 588 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
*1333 , (1958); (La.App.
Ciecierski v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 572 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Martinez v. Soignier 570 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Owens v. Jackson 550 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
On the appeal of this matter we can only review the record before us. The essential elements for a claim for defamation are: (1) defamatory words; (2) communication to persons other than the one alleging the action; (3) falsity; (4) malice, actual or implied; (5) resulting injury, , (1958), (La.App.
Jacobs v. O'Bannon 531 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
App. 3 Cir.1978); , (1958).
Taylor v. Town of Arcadia 519 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
(1958), holding that a mere insinuation is as actionable as a positive assertion if the meaning is plain and the words taken in their ordinary usage convey a degrading imputation, no matter how indirectly.
Munson v. Gaylord Broadcasting Co. 491 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
(1958), further explains: "Libel is actionable under Article 2315 of the Civil Code, declaring that every act of man causing damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it....
Elmer v. Coplin 485 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Juneau v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 482 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
(1958); Mulina v. Item Co., 217 La.
Garrett v. Kneass 482 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Bradford v. Murray 467 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Cashio v. Holt 425 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
App.2d Cir.1975); , (1958).
Champagne v. Alsobrook 419 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1980), declares that a successful action in defamation requires a showing of “(1) defamatory words; (2) publication; (3) falsity; (4) malice, actual or implied; and (5) resulting injury.” Plaintiff argues that defendant’s remarks were defamatory because they tend to expose him to ridicule, , (1958), and that they are presumed to be malicious because they adversely affect his professional reputation, Wiel v. Israel, 42 La.Ann.
Schaefer v. Lynch 406 So. 2d 185 La. 1981
(1958) held that a truthful statement conveying a defamatory insinuation is actionable.
Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Apparently the Louisiana courts have made the distinction between words "defamatory per se"
Lewis v. Baton Rouge Oil & Chemical Workers Union 387 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Madison v. Bolton, (La.1958) , .
Joiner v. Weeks 383 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
[ , (1958)] as `good faith, an interest to be upheld and a statement limited in scope to this purpose, a proper occasion, and publication in the proper manner and to proper parties only.'
Corcoran v. NEW ORLEANS FIRE FIGHTER'S ETC. 379 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
(1958), the Supreme Court listed as valid "defenses" in a libel case (1) truth; (2) fair comment and criticism (concerning persons in public life); and (3) privilege.
Morris v. Gray & Co. 378 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1958); Mitchell v. Truck Service, Inc., (La.App.
Slocum v. Webb 375 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
12 , (1960) ; , (1958) ; Kennedy v. Item Co., 197 La.
Lees v. Smith 363 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
(1958); Rougeau v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Boyd v. Community Ctr. Credit Corp. 359 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Shylock, Inc. v. Covenant Broad. Corp. of La. 352 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
The meaning of "defamatory per se" , (1958), wherein the court said: "Words charged to be libelous have been classified as those that are susceptible of a defamatory meaning and those that are indisputably defamatory on their face.
Mashburn v. Collin 355 So. 2d 879 La. 1977
[42] E. g., , (1958) (see extensive authorities cited); Matassa v. Bel, 246 La.
McGowen v. Prentice 341 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Ward v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 339 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Alleman v. VERMILION PUBLISHING CORPORATION 316 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
and the extensive authorities therein cited.'
Carter v. Catfish Cabin 316 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Rosen v. Capital City Press 314 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
12 , (1960); , (1958); Kennedy v. Item Co., 197 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by