Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key, 99 So. 2d 82.

21 citing documents.

State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key, , (1958).
Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd. 561 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
613 , (1946); Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , (1958); Kendrick v. Kendrick, 236 La.
Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. Pitcher 361 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
See Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key, , (1958).
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. CHURCHILL FARMS, INC. 292 So. 2d 183 La. 1974
1035 , (1969); Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key, , (1958); State, (La.App.
Mouledous v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 281 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
For instance, in Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key, , (1958) the plaintiff expropriated a strip of land along a railroad to dig a large drainage ditch.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Allen 243 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
259 , ; Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , ; Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry, 232 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. James 226 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
259 , ; Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , ; Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry, 232 La.
Board of Commissioners v. Lomm 220 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
In the latter case the Third Circuit Court of Appeal referred to Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key, , , in which the Supreme Court had allowed interest from judicial demand and the Salter decision said that “the Gravity Drainage District case is the last expression of our Supreme Court on the question and is controlling here.” Then came the case of State through Sabine River Authority v. Miller, 250 La.
Sterkx v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Rapides Par. 214 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
(As a matter of fact, the Miller decision did not overrule Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , , where the court had held the present public body is liable for legal interest from the date of judicial demand.)
Orleans Parish School Board v. Schuler 200 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
See State of Louisiana through the Department of Highways v. Bahry, La.App., ; State of Louisiana through the Sabine River Authority v. Salter, La.App., ; Gravity Drainage District No. 1, , .
Trunkline Gas Company v. Verzwyvelt 196 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
278 , (cost of refencing and of placing sidewalks); , (cost of building culverts to restore access); State Through Dept. of Highways v. Burleigh, La.App.
State Ex Rel. Sabine River Authority v. Miller 198 So. 2d 397 La. 1967
In the Salter case, the Court of Appeal allowed interest from judicial demand in an expropriation proceeding, predicating its ruling on the case of Gravity Drainage District No. 1 of Rapides Parish, , , which will be discussed hereinafter.
State, Sabine River Authority v. Salter 184 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
But then came Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , (1958), a suit, like the present, brought by the expropriating authority to take property for public purposes, under the general expropriation law.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Phillips 180 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Levy 136 So. 2d 35 La. 1961
See, Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , ; Koerber v. City of New Orleans, 228 La.
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Fuselier 133 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
The most recent and the most pertinent to the issue is Gravity Drainage District No. 1 of Rapides Parish v. Key, 1958, , , in which the plaintiff was expropriating a right of way for a drainage canal which was to run along a railroad track in such a way as to separate the tracks from the remaining property of the defendant which was shown to have considerable value for industrial sites due to its access to the railroad
State v. Williams 131 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
AK Roy, Inc. v. Board of Com'rs for Pontchartrain LD 117 So. 2d 60 La. 1960
345 , , and Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , , are inapposite from a factual or legal standpoint.
City of New Orleans v. Giraud 115 So. 2d 349 La. 1959
1 , ; Gravity Drainage District No. 1 of Rapides Parish v. Key, 1958, , .
Weiss v. Board of Commissioners 115 So. 2d 804 La. 1959
345 , and Gravity Drainage District No. 1 , .
State v. Tolmas 113 So. 2d 288 La. 1959
Gravity-Drainage District No. 1 , .