Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. v. Sauls, 99 So. 2d 97.

22 citing documents.

Orleans Parish School Board v. Schuler 200 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
“ * * * It is well settled that mere consequential injuries to the owners arising from disturbance or injury to business are damna absque injuria * * *” , .
Florida Gas Transmission Co. v. Munson 198 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
223 , ; , ; State v. Dowling, 205 La.
State, Department of Highways v. Babineaux 189 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Unfortunately, under the prevalent jurisprudence the owner is not entitled to compensation for non-economic consequential injuries such as discomfort, disturbance, or loss of esthetic value in expropriation proceedings, , , Rapides Parish School Board v. Nassif, 232 La.
Gulf States Utilities Company v. Norman 183 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
223 , ; , ; State v. Dowling, 205 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Acme Brick Co. 162 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
640 , it was held that mere consequential injuries to owners of property, arising from discomfort, disturbance, injury to business, and the like, are sacrifices which society has the right to ask for the public good, and are not compen-sable.” The rule was enunciated as follows in State, through Department of Highways, v. Sauls, , , which is certainly applicable herein : “There is no merit in defendant’s contention that his remaining property i. e., his grocery merchandise, trade fixtures, and f
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Carmouche 155 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
587 , ; , ; Rapides Parish School Board v. Nassif, 232 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. O'Neal 150 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
587 , ; , ; Rapides Parish School Board v. Nassif, 232 La.
State v. Henderson 138 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Madden 139 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Gwin 138 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
668 , ; , ; State v. Grand Consistory, etc., 237 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Levy 136 So. 2d 35 La. 1961
218 , ; East Baton Rouge Parish Council v. Koller, La.App., ; , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Cordaro 133 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State v. Crockett 131 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
It has been held that "* * * the best guide is evidence of sales of similar or comparable properties in the vicinity * * *" ( , , 101) and that such sales are the best criteria of value in expropriation proceedings.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Pace 131 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
1005 , ; , ; State through Department of Highways v. Ragusa, supra.
Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Harang 131 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
740 , ; Louisiana Highway Commission v. Boudreaux, supra; , 99 So.
Central La. El. Co. v. Covington & St. Tammany L. & I. Co. 131 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
521 ; , , such damages, however, are compensable and recoverable to the extent they decrease or diminish the market value of the owner's remaining property.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. McDuffie 123 So. 2d 93 La. 1960
223 , ; State v. Sauls, 1958, , ; and State v. Dowling, 1944, 205 La.
Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Edwards 119 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
(Cf., "various considerations, such as location, assembly or plottage value, corner influence, and best use, are of great importance in fixing market value", , , 102.)
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Esnard 117 So. 2d 52 La. 1960
101, we recognized the difficulty in applying rules with respect to a determination of fair market value in expropriation proceedings and said: “ * * * As has often been said by this Court, the best guide is evidence of sales of similar or comparable properties in the vicinity.
Parish of Iberia v. Cook 116 So. 2d 491 La. 1959
the property involved fronted on two streets and an alley and improvements covered practically the whole land area.
Orleans Parish School Board v. Paternostro 107 So. 2d 451 La. 1958
State v. Dowling, 205 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Mortallaro 101 So. 2d 450 La. 1958
262 , .” , , we recognized the difficulty experienced in the application of rules with respect to a determination of fair market value in expropriation proceedings and said: “As has often been said by this Court, the best guide is evidence of sales of similar or comparable proper *747 ties in the vicinity.