Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vicknair v. Vicknair, 112 So. 2d 702.

54 citing documents.

Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
So.2d 702 (1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Bourg v. Bourg 701 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Caldwell v. Caldwell 672 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Veron v. Veron 657 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
The question thus becomes whether Mrs. Veron demonstrated her necessitous circumstances by a preponderance of the evidence: The test is not whether the wife has the means to support herself in the manner to which she is accustomed to live, but what will provide her with sufficient means for her maintenance, , (1959), the wife having the burden of establishing her necessitous circumstances.
Unkel v. Unkel 651 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Allen v. Allen 648 So. 2d 359 La. 1994
Allen v. Allen 642 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Currier v. Currier 599 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Kelly v. Kelly 596 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1959), we held that when a husband obtains an absolute divorce under La.R.S.
Hornsby v. Hornsby 592 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Taylor v. Taylor 579 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Brewer v. Brewer 573 So. 2d 467 La. 1991
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Wester v. Wester 564 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Gipson v. Gipson 536 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Penning v. Bouzon 524 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Suhren v. Suhren 505 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
*131 1032 , (1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Lagars v. Lagars 491 So. 2d 5 La. 1986
(1959), we held that when a husband obtains an absolute divorce under La.
Zeringue v. Zeringue 479 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Lewis v. Lewis 446 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Jones v. Jones 442 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Slaughter v. Slaughter 436 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Holmgren v. Kaigle 425 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Rodrigue v. Rodrigue 424 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Perrilloux v. Perrilloux 424 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lloveras v. Reichert, 197 La.
Harrington v. Campbell 413 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Adams v. Adams, supra; Pearce v. Pearce, supra; , Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 407 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Lauro v. Lauro 399 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Adams v. Adams 389 So. 2d 381 La. 1980
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Higdon v. Higdon 385 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Bernhardt v. Bernhardt, supra [ ]; Vicknair v. Johnson ( Vicknair ), , (1959); Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Short v. Fink 372 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Kendrick v. Kendrick, supra; Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Bruner v. Bruner 364 So. 2d 1015 La. 1978
Kendrick v. Kendrick [ 236 La.
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 362 So. 2d 568 La. 1978
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Loyacano v. Loyacano 358 So. 2d 304 La. 1978
Bernhardt v. Bernhardt, supra; Vicknair v. Johnson (Vicknair), , (1959); Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Pearce v. Pearce 348 So. 2d 75 La. 1977
(1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Barrios v. Barrios 342 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1959); writ refused, 257 La.
Ward v. Ward 339 So. 2d 839 La. 1976
Bernhardt v. Bernhardt, supra; Vicknair v. Johnson (Vicknair), , (1959); Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Ward v. Ward 332 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
[8] , ; Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Sarpy v. Sarpy 323 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
"The test is not whether the wife has the means to support herself in the manner to which she is accustomed to live, but what will provide her with sufficient means for her maintenance, , (1959), the wife having the burden of establishing her necessitous circumstances.
Hermes v. Hermes 327 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
587 , , , , Felger v. Doty, 217 La.
Carter v. Carter 316 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
168 , (1970); , (1959); Richards v. Garth, 223 La.
Bryant v. Bryant 310 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
"The test is not whether the wife has the means to support herself in the manner to which she is accustomed to live, but what will provide her with sufficient means for her maintenance, , (1959), the wife having the burden of establishing her necessitous circumstances, Malone v. Malone, 260 La.
Frederic v. Frederic 302 So. 2d 903 La. 1974
The test is not whether the wife has the means to support herself in the manner to which she is accustomed to live, but what will provide her with sufficient means for her maintenance, , (1959), the wife having the burden of establishing her necessitous circumstances.
Fulmer v. Fulmer 301 So. 2d 622 La. 1974
(1959); Kendrick v. Kendrick, 236 La.
Broussard v. Broussard 275 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Malone v. Malone 243 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
1004 , ; , ; Fruehan v. Fruehan, La.
Adler v. Adler 239 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Kendrick v. Kendrick, supra ; Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
Leavines v. Leavines 224 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
1004 , ; , ; Fruehan v. Fruehan, La.App., .
Davidson v. Jenkins 216 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
[3] , and the cases cited therein.
Smith v. Smith 216 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
The definition of "fault" as given in Felger v. Doty, supra
Calloway v. Calloway 139 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962