Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pechon v. National Corporation Service, 100 So. 2d 213.

21 citing documents.

Tate v. WOMAN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 2747 [2] ; Pechon v. National Corp. Service, Inc., , (1958); Ouebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297 (La.
Saacks v. Mohawk Carpet Corp. 855 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Pechon v. National Corp. Service, Inc., , (1958).
Tolliver v. CONCORIDA WATERWORKS DIST. 1 735 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
App. 2 Cir.1982); , 234 La.
Harris v. West Carroll Parish School Bd. 605 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
1988); Pechon v. National Corp. Service, Inc., , (1958).
Keller v. Sisters of Charity 597 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Williams v. Delta Haven, Inc.
Massey v. G.B. Cooley Hospital for Retarded Citizens 593 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., -04 (La.1988); Pechon v. National Corp. Service, Inc., , (1958).
Herbert v. Placid Refining Co. 564 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., -04 (La.1988); Pechon v. National Corp. Service, Inc., , (1958).
Roberts v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. 550 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Art. 2747; , Williams v. Delta Haven, Inc., (La.App.
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1101 La. 1988
Pechon v. National Corporation *1104 Service, Inc., , (1958); United Credit Co., Inc. v. Croswell Co., Inc., 219 La.
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Williams v. Delta Haven, Inc., (La.App.
Thebner v. Xerox Corp. 480 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
2nd Cir.1982); , (1958).
Williams v. Delta Haven, Inc. 416 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Baynard v. GUARDIAN LIFE INS. CO., ETC. 399 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Article 167, 2746, Civil Code; , (1958); (La.App.
Clements v. Ryan 382 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Morgan v. Avondale Shipyards 376 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Defendant's exception of no cause of action, and the trial judge's explanation of his judgment maintaining it, rely on plaintiff's failure to allege that he was employed for a definite term and on the accepted legal proposition that an employment for an indefinite term is terminable at will by either employer or employee, Pechon v. National Corp. Serv., 1958, , .
Griffith v. SOLLAY FOUNDATION DRILL. 373 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
(1958); Simmons v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, supra.
Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. 344 So. 2d 1353 La. 1977
art. 2747; , (1958); Ingram v. Kaiser Alum.
Hodges v. DeCoteau 314 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Pechon v. National Corp. Service, Inc., , ; Graham v. Magnolia School, La.App., .
Followed Senac v. LM Berry Company 299 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Smith v. Sohio Petroleum Company 163 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
the court interpreted these codal articles as follows: "Plaintiff testified that the contract of employment was for life.
Manning v. Shreveport Transit Co. 130 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Art. 2746, LSA-Civ.Code; Pechon v. National Corporation Service, Inc., 1958, , ; Page v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 1936, 184 La.