DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, 105 So. 2d 269.

42 citing documents.

  • Murphy v. KD Auger Trucking, Inc. 598 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    In its discussion of Phillips's actions, , -72 (La.1958), which sets out the duties of a motorist approaching a mounted horse on the highway: [A motorist is] not required to reduce his speed at all when meeting or passing animal drawn vehicles or mounted horses on the highway unless he observes that the animal or animals are frightened or i
  • Sprinkle v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 564 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    The seminal case discussing a motorist’s responsibility when passing a , (1958).
  • Michelli v. Steve 554 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Tesvich v. 3-A's Towing Co. 547 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    13:4203; -713 (La.1986); Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., , (1958); (La.App.
  • Byrd v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 543 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., , (1958).
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guidry 536 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    The law concerning the conduct of motorists who encounter a , 272 (1958) as follows: “The rule of conduct now imposed upon a motorist is that he is not required to reduce his speed at all when meeting or passing animal drawn vehicles or mounted horses on the highway unless he observes that the animal or animals are frightened or indicate in some manner that
  • Toups v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 507 So. 2d 809 La. 1987
  • State v. Guidry 467 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Williams 449 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 422 So. 2d 1109 La. 1982
    A nine-year-old may be capable of contributory negligence, but like a 12-year-old, Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, 1958, , , he is not held to adult standards of comprehension of danger and duty of self-care.
  • Ryle v. Potter 413 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Wilkinson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 411 So. 2d 22 La. 1982
    Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., , (1958).
  • Wilkinson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 400 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Chausse v. Southland Corp. 400 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Dufrene v. Dixie Auto Insurance Co., et al., (La.
  • Dufrene v. Dixie Auto Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 162 La. 1979
    (1958); Arata v. Orleans Capital Stores, 219 La.
  • Mays v. American Indem. Co. 365 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    Appellants assign as error: (1) the trial court's finding that Thomas was driving at an excessive rate of speed; (2) , (1958) (La.App.
  • Outlaw v. Bituminous Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    A nine-year-old may be capable of contributory negligence, but like a 12-year-old, Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, 1958, , , he is not held to adult standards of comprehension of danger and duty of self-care.
  • White v. Nicosia 351 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    (1958); Restatement, Second, Torts § 283A (1965); Prosser, supra; Harper & James, Law of Torts, § 16.8 (1974); 77 A.L.R.2d 917 (1961).
  • Handy v. LeJeune 341 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    A motorist's duty vis-a-vis a , (1958), where the court quotes 60 C.J.S.
  • Simmons v. Beauregard Parish School Board 315 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., , (1958); Murray v. Volkswagen Mid-American, Inc., Savoy v. State ex rel.
  • Kontomitras v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 314 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    [4] , ; Cusimano v. City of New Orleans, 123 La.
  • Freeman v. Wilcox 303 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    The general rule in regard to contributory negligence of children is discussed at *843 , (1958), where it is stated as follows: "The general rule in regard to the contributory negligence of children is stated in 38 American Jurisprudence, Verbo Negligence, para. 204, page 884 thus: `Generally speaking, children are required to exercise ordinary care to avoid injuries to themselves.
  • Brantley v. Brown 277 So. 2d 141 La. 1973
  • Skains v. Allstate Insurance 264 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., , ; Woods v. Cappo, et al., La.App., ; Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, 219 La.
  • Dawson v. Fleming 260 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Biggs v. Verbois, La.App.
  • Tyler v. Jefferson Parish School Board 258 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1958) is to the effect that a 12 year old child may be guilty of contributory negligence.
  • Davis v. Allstate Insurance Co. 206 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    “Prosser’s Handbook of the Law of Torts (page 157) “Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, (1958) , “Gaspard v. Grain Dealers Mutual Ins.
  • McGraw v. Crook 205 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Curry v. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co. 202 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Tate v. Hill 197 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Cusimano v. City of New Orleans, 123 La.
  • Cormier v. Sinegal 180 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    Biggs v. Verbois, La.App.
  • Edelen v. Zurich Insurance 165 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    32:22; , (1958), reversing ; Joyner v. Williams, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1948); Juhas v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa., La.App., (4th Cir. 1962) and Smith v. Louisiana Power and Light Company, La.App., 158 So.
  • Kimball v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 161 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    252 , 8 L.R.A.,N.S., 480) ; however, even if it has been established that a child is capable of contributory negligence, such negligence is nevertheless not measured by the same standard applied to an adult, but must be judged in accordance with the individual child’s experience, understanding, age, and intelligence ( , ).
  • Distinguished Youngblood v. Newspaper Production Company 158 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    The cases of Delahoussaye v. City of New Iberia, La.App.1st Cir., 1948, , , , are readily distinguishable from the instant case.
  • Smith v. Whittington 159 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    (1958) cited in behalf of appellant involved a twelve year old boy who had been warned by his parents not to ride his horse across a traffic bridge, but to lead him.
  • Scheu v. Newsham 157 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    2 Cir. 1962) , , (1958) appropriate *762 to a situation where a minor, injured in an accident, is accused of contributory negligence.
  • Biggs v. Verbois 151 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    In this respect, however, , ; Rodriguez v. Abadie, La.App., 168 So.
  • Blanchard v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 153 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    763 ; Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, 1958, , .
  • Davis v. Le Blanc 149 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Hollis v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App.
  • Danna v. London Guarantee & Accident Company 147 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    (1958), the court enunciated the following principles: "`* * * As to the child plaintiff, however, the caution required is determined according to the maturity and capacity of the plaintiff under the particular circumstances of the case.'
  • Sepulvado v. General Fire & Casualty Company 146 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    1045 , ; Delahoussaye v. City of New Iberia, La.App., ; Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., , .
  • Juhas v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa. 140 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    were a twelve year old boy was held not to be guilty of contributory negligence in riding a horse across a traffic bridge.