Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Nourse, 101 So. 2d 204.
-
Succession of Michelle Beth Roy Booth and Robert Mark Booth, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
764, [(1957)]; So.2d 204 [(1958)].
-
In the Matter of the Succession of John Robert Biscamp
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
764, [ (1957) ]; So.2d 204 [(1958)].
-
In re the Succession of Biscamp
211 So. 3d 472
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
764 , [ (1957) ]; , [ (1958) ].
-
Succession of Holbrook
144 So. 3d 845
La. 2014
764 , [ (1957) ]; , 101 * [(1958)].
- Succession of Porche 273 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1973
- McCullough v. Bridges 245 So. 2d 319 La. 1971
- Succession of Veal 242 So. 2d 551 La. 1970
- Succession of Morgan 242 So. 2d 551 La. 1970
-
Succession of Gordon
233 So. 2d 54
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
Succession of Pickett, La.App., 1st Cir. ; Succession of Barrieu, La.App., 4th Cir., A.L.R.2d 820 .” [ ] In applying the reasoning of the above cases to the instant one, we find that the omission of the date from the attestation clause is not in subs
-
Ryland v. Wenner
224 So. 2d 502
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Succession of Pickett, La.App.
-
Succession of Babin
215 So. 2d 649
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In the , , the Supreme Court had under consideration the validity of a statutory will consisting of two sheets with the signature of the testator on both sheets, but the signature on the second sheet was at the end of the document in company with the signatures of the witnesses and the Notary and did not appear
-
Land v. Succession of Newsom
193 So. 2d 411
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
In support of the contention so made, counsel for appellants rely upon the , (1958) and the Succession of Eck, 233 La.
- Succession of Michie 183 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
- Succession of Saarela 151 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963