Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Company, 102 So. 2d 451.

35 citing documents.

Bize v. Boyer 402 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
*115 , (1958), wherein a motorist crossing a highway in a fog was exonerated from fault even though her vehicle was struck by a motorist traveling upon the highway in his proper lane of travel.
Lapeyrouse v. LeCompte 343 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1958), wherein a motorist crossing a highway in a fog was exonerated from fault even though her vehicle was struck by a motorist traveling upon the highway in his proper lane of travel.
O'NEAL v. Southern Farm Bureau Insurance Co. 325 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(1958); Castille v. Richard, 157 La.
Campbell v. American Home Assurance Company 258 So. 2d 81 La. 1972
(1958); Castille v. Richard, 157 La.
Marcin v. Harkins 241 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Co., 234 La.1048, ; Zager v. Allstate Insurance Co., La.App.
Campbell v. American Home Assurance Co. 241 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
1084 , (1945); , 102 So.
Dugas v. Achord 238 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
the Supreme Court held: “The law governing the operation of motor vehicles generally is well stated in F. Strauss and Son, Inc., v. Childers, La.App., 147 So.
Dove v. Messina 230 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
1084 , ; , ; Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
Crockett v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 229 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
1084 , ; , ; Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
Ardoin v. Travelers Ins. Co. 229 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
1084 , (1945); , (1958); Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
St. Amand v. Petro Sales, Inc. 225 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Gagnard 223 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
West v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., La.App.3d Cir., 218 So.
West v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. 218 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Zager v. Allstate Insurance Co., La.App.
Crain v. W. R. Core Construction Co. 215 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
1084 , ; , *673 ; Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
Miller v. Kinney 213 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
(1958); Geoghegan v. Greyhound Corp., 226 La.
Arnold v. Traders & General Insurance 204 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
1084 , ; , ; Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
Sittig v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 198 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Co., , (1958); King v. Risdon & W. E. Holoman Lumber Company, (La.
Beaugh v. Broussard 199 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
(1958) and cases cited therein; Brown v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc., ; (La.
Brown v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc. 198 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Counsel argues that it is the unvarying rule of this state that when visibility ahead is not possible or is greatly obscured, a motorist must stop his car and remain at a standstill until conditions warrant going forward, , (1958); Vowell v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins.
Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 192 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
2d 148 ; , ; Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
Davis v. Bankston 192 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 188 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Co., , ; Seal v. Core, La.
Christ v. State, Department of Highways 161 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
If that is true, then it seems to me that the duty of the highway authorities to provide adequate warnings also should be viewed in the light of the well established jurisprudence of this State, , 102 So.
Theunissen v. Guidry 153 So. 2d 869 La. 1963
Cook v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 158 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Mitchell v. National Surety Corp 149 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Carriere v. Aetna Casualty Company 146 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
See cases cited in our original opinion; also, , ; Washington Fire & Marine Ins.
Lewis v. Quebedeaux 134 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
See cases cited in our original opinion; also, , ; Washington Fire & Marine Ins.
Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 133 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Pepper v. Walsworth, La.App.
Holt v. All State Insurance 131 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Plaintiff also calls to our attention Marquez v. Miller, La.App., which holds that it is usually negligence to strike a , holding that a motorist does not have the right to assume that his course of travel is free of danger or obstruction in the absence of his ability to see clearly ahead.
Alderman v. Henderson 130 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Co. et al., 1958, , ; Service Fire Ins.
Broussard v. American Insurance Co. 127 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
the Supreme Court said: “Contributory negligence is a special defense, and the defendant carries the burden of establishing it by a preponderance of the evidence.
D & D PLANTING CO. v. Employers Casualty Co. 124 So. 2d 908 La. 1960
Hargett v. Chemical Service, Inc. 116 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
717 , ; Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Co. [ ], .
Cofield v. Burgdorf 115 So. 2d 357 La. 1959
Co., , ; Herget v. Saucier, 223 La.