Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co., 105 So. 2d 392.

62 citing documents.

Sheila Broussard Guidry v. Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Succession of Lucille Watts Patin, Pamela Sue Patin Quantz, Charleen Patin Taylor, Rebel Kelley Caplinger, Denis Curtin Kelley, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Co., So.2d 392, 403 (La.
Hines v. Hyde 251 So. 3d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
art. 1848, which prohibits the use of "testimonial or other evidence" to negate or vary the terms of an authentic act, and argues that parol evidence is expressly prohibited in a petitory action, Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publ'g Co. , , (1957).
Glassell Producing Co. v. Naquin 224 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(1957), Further, we note that the parties do not contest the property boundary descriptions, or that the property description is otherwise inaccurate.
Duncan Oil, Inc. v. the Louisiana State Mineral and Energy Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Record Publ’g Co., (1958).
Duncan Oil, Inc. v. State Mineral & Energy Board 216 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Record Publ’g Co., , (1958).
Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C. v. Roderick A. James and the United States Department of Treasury-Internal Revenue Service 156 So. 3d 1143 La. 2014
First National Bank, USA v. DDS Construction, LLC 91 So. 3d 944 La. 2012
Co., , (1958) (Tate, J., on reh’g).
First NBC Bank v. Gusman 79 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Brandner v. Staf-Rath, L.L.C. 64 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., , (citations omitted).
Loutre Land and Timber Co. v. Roberts 47 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Co., , (1957) (A sale by given bounds conveys only the property within such bounds, and acreage designations appended to such specific descriptions do not enlarge or restrict the grant described by the specific bounds.)
Mathews v. Mathews 817 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Mixon v. Timberstone, L.L.C. 815 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
(1958) (Tate, J. on rehearing).
Ridgedell v. Succession of Kuyrkendall 740 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co., [ ]
Craftsmen Homes v. Hollywood Door 583 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(1958) (Tate, J. on rehearing).
Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
(1958) (Tate, J. on rehearing).
Arms v. New Orleans Area Council, Boy Scouts of America 522 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1958); Bender v. Chew, 129 La.
Robinette v. Myers 510 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Humphrey v. St. Louis 492 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
242 (1933); , (1957); Collins v. Sun Oil Co., 223 La.
CAMELLIA PLACE SUBDIVISION-BLOCK 1 ASS'N v. Willet 491 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Kalmn, Inc. v. Walker Louisiana Properties 488 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Plaintiff says that the March 19, 1930 instrument was merely a correction instrument which relates back to the date of the sale, namely, November 17, 1924, Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Company, [ ], and since there was no drilling operations on the property during the ten (10) year period of time the mineral servitude prescribed on November 17, 1934.
Nugent v. Franks 471 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Moyse v. Runnels School, Inc. 457 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
408 , -48 (1963); , (1958) (on rehearing).
Hollier v. Galtier 430 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. [ ]
Northcott Exploration Co. v. WR Grace & Co. 430 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Weaver v. Hailey 416 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
(1958), the plaintiff in a petitory action claimed ownership of 408 acres by record title originating with a sale of a fractional section of land less and except the 408 acres which were not adequately described.
Stutts v. Humphries 408 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Kile v. Louisiana Limestone Aggregates, Inc. 378 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
” “ , (1958), the same court held a sale to be one ‘per aversionem’ where the property conveyed was described as follows: ‘That portion of lot or Fractional section 40 lying West of the section line between Sections seven (7) and eight (8) above, produced and a line drawn West from a point on the center line
Harper v. Buckelew 355 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Sick v. Bendix-United Geophysical Corp. 341 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
100 (1909), , (1958), Tinsley v. Seismic Explorations, Inc., 239 La.
Jackson v. D'AUBIN 338 So. 2d 575 La. 1976
883 , (1960); , (1958); McDuffie v. Walker, 125 La.
TOWN SOUTH ESTATES HOMES ASS'N, INC. v. Walker 332 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Defendant cites Blevins v. *890 Manufactures Record Publishing Company, , (1958), in support of his argument.
Prather v. Valien 327 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Wood v. Morvant 321 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Ledoux v. Waterbury 292 So. 2d 485 La. 1974
(1958) extensively summarizing the well settled jurisprudence.
Dixie Electric Membership Corp. v. Henderson 292 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State v. Placid Oil Company 274 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Cornish v. Kinder Canal Company 267 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Clampitt v. Davis Brothers Lumber Co. 266 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
242 (1933); , (1957); Collins v. Sun Oil Co., 223 La.
Deselle v. Bonnette 251 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Jurisprudence under Code of Practice Articles 43 and 44 establishes the rule that in a petitory action against a defendant in possession the plaintiff must make out his title to the property claimed and must recover upon the strength of his own title and not upon the weakness of the defendant possessor's, , 105 So.
Valley Land Corporation v. Fielder 242 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
We think the following cases support the general principle that parol evidence should not be admitted to prove an extension of a right to redeem immovables: , (1957); Andrews v. Tores, et ux, La.App.
Moore v. Shell Oil Company 228 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Blevins v. Manufacturers Record *211 Publishing Co., , ; McDuffie v. Walker, 125 La.
St. Landry Loan Company v. Etienne 227 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
American Creosote Co. v. Springer 232 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
100 ; , ; Vaughn v. Kemp, 4 La.App.
Clark v. Lee 221 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Gibson v. Dalton 220 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
extensively summarizing the well settled jurisprudence.
Robichaux v. Pool 209 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
414 held as follows: “In the first place, ‘Every transfer of immovable property must be in writing * * Article 2275 of the LSA-Civil Code.
Loeb v. Badalamenti 192 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
160 , ; , ; Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Woodcock, La.App., ; Hasslocher v. Recknagel, La.App., ; Industrial Outdoor Displays v. Reuter, La.App., .
Anderson v. Courtney 190 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Munson v. Berdon, La.App., ; , .
Richland Insurance Agency & Realty Co. v. Adams 185 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
In Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. (1958), , , the opinion of the court again declared that it is unnecessary to deraign title back beyond the acquisition of title by the common author.