Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cerniglia v. City of New Orleans, 101 So. 2d 218.

21 citing documents.

Toth v. Ensco Environmental Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-222 (1958), appears the following: In their application for a rehearing the appellees herein complained that we erred in failing to allow interest at the legal rate from date of judicial demand and further that we failed to consider the payment of costs other than experts' fees.
Mini Togs Products, Inc. v. Wallace 513 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
595 , (1969); , (1958); Troquille v. LaCaze's Estate, 222 La.
James, Robinson, Felts & Starnes v. Powell 303 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Sterkx v. Gravity District No. 1 of Rapides Parish, La.App., (3d Cir. 1968); , ; Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District v. Prestridge, La.App., 3 Cir., .
Department of Highways v. Capone 298 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Thomas & Warner, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 230 La.
State, Department of Highways v. Strickland 290 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1958) the Supreme Court enunciated this principle as follows: "From a perusal of the cases cited by the district court, and noting the similarity of factual situations with the case under consideration, the conclusion is inescapable that the rules announced in those cases are controlling.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Cangelosi 290 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State, Department of Highways v. Smith 272 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
(1958), that: "No part of plaintiffs' property was taken; their cause of action is founded on Article 1, Section 2 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1921, providing compensation for damage in cases of expropriation."
Distinguished State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Carso 261 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Garrick 256 So. 2d 111 La. 1971
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Rivers 242 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Garrick 242 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Hebert v. State, Department of Highways 238 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
291 , ; , ; State, Through Department of Highways v. Chesson, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1970); Reymond v. State, Through Department of Highways, 255 La.
Reymond v. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways 231 So. 2d 375 La. 1970
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Chesson 229 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Reymond v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 217 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
(1958), in which access to plaintiff’s property was limited by an underpass in front of it, an award was made because of the peculiar location of the subject property with reference to the underpass.
Sterkx v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Rapides Par. 214 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District v. Prestridge, La.App.
Caronna v. Louisiana Department of Highways 208 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Patin v. City of New Orleans, 223 La.
State, Through Department of Highways v. Terry 194 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
(1958), in which access to plaintiff's property was limited by an underpass in front of it, an award was made because of the peculiar location of the subject property with reference to the underpass.
City of New Orleans v. Doll 146 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
The trial court’s decision is not only in accord with the express wording of Article 553 of the Code of Practice of 1870, but is supported in its interpretation of this article by the Supreme Court’s , , a case very similar to the one under consideration here.
Efurd v. City of Shreveport 105 So. 2d 219 La. 1958
Buras Ice Factory, Inc. v. Department of Highways 103 So. 2d 74 La. 1958