Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Murphy, 102 So. 2d 61.

19 citing documents.

  • Jenkins v. Baldwin 801 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    276 ; , , certiorari denied 357 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bennett 517 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    2d 358 (La.1982); , cert.
  • State v. Paciera 290 So. 2d 681 La. 1974
  • State v. Blankenship 277 So. 2d 639 La. 1973
    2d 763 (1965); , (1957).
  • State v. Johnson 268 So. 2d 620 La. 1972
    (1968); State v. Square, 257 La.
  • State v. Robinson 267 So. 2d 182 La. 1972
    15:441; State *30 v. Murphy, , (1955).
  • State v. Cripps 250 So. 2d 382 La. 1971
  • State v. Elie 241 So. 2d 515 La. 1970
    “For examples of the cases, , (1958), cert.
  • State v. Marks 211 So. 2d 261 La. 1968
    276 ; , , cert, denied, 357 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct.
  • State v. Iverson 204 So. 2d 772 La. 1967
    See, e. g., , ; State v. Labry, 124 La.
  • State v. Carter 181 So. 2d 763 La. 1966
    relied upon by the trial judge in making his ruling, and which is to the effect that a trial judge must be accorded wide discretion to determine whether particular evidence sought to be introduced in a criminal prosecution is relevant to the case.
  • State v. Clifton 172 So. 2d 657 La. 1965
  • State v. Clifton 172 So. 2d 657 La. 1965
  • State v. Rideau 137 So. 2d 283 La. 1962
    451 , ; , , certiorari denied 357 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brown 136 So. 2d 394 La. 1962
    “ ‘A trial judge must be accorded a wide discretion to determine whether particular evidence sought to be introduced in criminal prosecution is relevant to case.’ , .
  • State v. Jenkins 107 So. 2d 632 La. 1958
    276 ; , , certiorari denied 357 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct.
  • State v. Rue 107 So. 2d 702 La. 1958
    300 , ; , ), the uneontradicted testimony taken concerning this point, as the trial court stated in his Per Curiam, “shows that the drawing from the jury wheel was strictly according to law.” (Tr-43.)
  • State v. Fletcher 106 So. 2d 709 La. 1958
    13:1382, , , where the same points were raised and decided adversely to appellant.
  • State v. Egana 102 So. 2d 66 La. 1957
    Being found guilty on the second count of receiving stolen things valued at $75 and sentenced to serve one year at hard labor in the State penitentiary, he prosecuted this appeal, relying on four bills of exceptions reserved by him during the trial, , .